We recently added support in PyHSS for fixed line SIP subscribers to attach to the IMS.
Traditional telecom operators are finding their fixed line network to be a bit of a money pit, something they’re required to keep operating to meet regulatory obligations, but the switches are sitting idle 99% of the time. As such we’re seeing more and more operators move fixed line subs onto their IMS.
This new feature means we can use PyHSS to serve as the brains for a fixed network, as well as for mobile, but there’s one catch – How we authenticate subscribers changes.
Most banks of line cards in a legacy telecom switches, or IP Phones, don’t have SIM slots to allow us to authenticate, so instead we’re forced to fallback to what they do support.
Unfortunately for the most part, what is supported by these IP phones or telecom switches is SIP MD5 Digest Authentication.
The Nonce is generated by the HSS and put into the Multimedia-Authentication-Answer, along with the subscriber’s password and sent in the clear to the S-CSCF.
The HSS then generates the the Multimedia-Auth Answer, it generates a nonce (in the 3GPP-SIP-Authenticate / 609 AVP) and sends the Subscriber’s password in the 3GPP-SIP-Authorization (610) AVP in response back to the S-CSCF.
I would have thought a better option would be for the HSS to generate the Nonce and Digest, and then the S-CSCF to just send the Nonce to the Sub and compare the returned Digest from the Sub against the expected Digest from the HSS, but it would limit flexibility (realm adaptation, etc) I guess.
The UE/UA (I guess it’s a UA in this context as it’s not a mobile) then generates its own Digest from the Nonce and sends it back to the S-CSCF via the P-CSCF.
The S-CSCF compares the received Digest response against the one it generated, and if the two match, the sub is authenticated and allowed to attach onto the network.
One day recently I was messing with the XCAP server, trying to set the Call Forward timeout. In the process I triggered the UE to send a USSD request to the IMS.
Huh, I thought, “I wonder how hard it would be to build a USSD Gateway for our IMS?”, and this my friends, is the story of how I wasted a good chunk of my weekend trying (and failing) to add support for USSD.
You might be asking “Who still uses USSD?” – The use cases for USSD are pretty thin on the ground in this day and age, but I guess balance query, and uh…
But this is the story of what I tried before giving up and going outside…
Routing
First I’d need to get the USSD traffic towards the USSD Gateway, this means modifying iFCs. Skimming over the spec I can see the Recv-Info: header for USSD traffic should be set to “g.3gpp.ussd” so I knocked up an iFC to match that, and route the traffic to my dev USSD Gateway, and added it to the subscriber profile in PyHSS:
Easy peasy, now we have the USSD requests hitting our USSD Gateway.
The Response
I’ll admit that I didn’t jump straight to the TS doc from the start.
The first place I headed was Google to see if I could find any PCAPs of USSD over IMS/SIP.
And I did – Restcomm seems to have had a USSD product a few years back, and trawling around their stuff provided some reference PCAPs of USSD over SIP.
So the flow seemed pretty simple, SIP INVITE to set up the session, SIP INFO for in-dialog responses and a BYE at the end.
With all the USSD guts transferred as XML bodies, in a way that’s pretty easy to understand.
Being a Kamailio fan, that’s the first place I started, but quickly realised that SIP proxies, aren’t great at acting as the UAS.
So I needed to generate in-dialog SIP INFO messages, so I turned to the UAC module to generate the SIP INFO response.
My Kamailio code is super simple, but let’s have a look:
request_route {
xlog("Request $rm from $fU");
if(is_method("INVITE")){
xlog("USSD from $fU to $rU (Emergency number) CSeq is $cs ");
sl_reply("200", "OK Trying USSD Phase 1"); #Generate 200 OK
route("USSD_Response"); #Call USSD_Response route block
exit;
}
}
route["USSD_Response"]{
xlog("USSD_Response Route");
#Generate a new UAC Request
$uac_req(method)="INFO";
$uac_req(ruri)=$fu; #Copy From URI to Request URI
$uac_req(furi)=$tu; #Copy To URI to From URI
$uac_req(turi)=$fu; #Copy From URI to To URI
$uac_req(callid)=$ci; #Copy Call-ID
#Set Content Type to 3GPP USSD
$uac_req(hdrs)=$uac_req(hdrs) + "Content-Type: application/vnd.3gpp.ussd+xml\r\n";
#Set the USSD XML Response body
$uac_req(body)="<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<ussd-data>
<language value=\"en\"/>
<ussd-string value=\"Bienvenido. Seleccione una opcion: 1 o 2.\"/>
</ussd-data>";
$uac_req(evroute)=1; #Set the event route to use on return replies
uac_req_send(); #Send it!
}
So the UAC module generates the 200 OK and sends it back.
“That was quick” I told myself, patting myself on the back before trying it out for the first time.
Huston, we have a problem – Although the Call-ID is the same, it’s not an in-dialog response as the tags aren’t present, this means our UE send back a 405 to the SIP INFO.
Right. Perhaps this is the time to read the Spec…
Okay, so the SIP INFO needs to be in dialog. Can we do that with the UAC module? Perhaps not…
But alas real life came back to rear its ugly head, and this adventure will have to continue another day…
Update: Thanks to a kindly provided PCAP I now know what I was doing wrong, and so we’ll soon have a follow up to this post named “Successes in cobbling together a USSD Gateway” just as soon as I have a weekend free.
I recently fell in love with the Prometheus + Grafana combo, and I’m including it in as much of my workflow as possible, so today we’ll be integrating this with another favorite – Kamailio.
Why would we want to integrate Kamailio into Prometheus + Grafana? Observability, monitoring, alerting, cool dashboards to make it look like you’re doing complicated stuff, this duo have it all!
I’m going to assume some level of familiarity with Prometheus here, and at least a basic level of understanding of Kamailio (if you’ve never worked with Kamailio before, check out my Kamailio 101 Series, then jump back here).
So what will we achieve today?
We’ll start with the simple SIP Registrar in Kamailio from this post, and we’ll add on the xhttp_prom module, and use it to expose some stats on the rate of requests, and responses sent to those requests.
So to get started we’ll need to load some extra modules, xhttp_prom module requires xhttp (If you’d like to learn the basics of xhttp there’s also a Kamailio Bytes – xHTTP Module post covering the basics) so we’ll load both.
xHTTP also has some extra requirements to load, so in the top of our config we’ll explicitly specify what ports we want to bind to, and set two parameters that control how Kamailio handles HTTP requests (otherwise you’ll not get responses for HTTP GET requests).
Then where you load all your modules we’ll load xhttp and xhttp_prom, and set the basic parameters:
loadmodule "xhttp.so"
loadmodule "xhttp_prom.so"
# Define two counters and a gauge
modparam("xhttp_prom", "xhttp_prom_stats", "all")
By setting xhttp_prom module to expose all stats, this exposes all of Kamailio’s internal stats as counters to Prometheus – This means we don’t need to define all our own counters / histograms / gauges, instead we can use the built in ones from Kamailio. Of course we can define our own custom ones, but we’ll do that in our next post.
Lastly we’ll need to add an event route to handle HTTP requests to the /metrics URL:
Recently I’ve been working on open source Diameter Routing Agent implementations (See my posts on FreeDiameter).
With the hurdles to getting a DRA working with open source software covered, the next step was to get all my Diameter traffic routed via the DRAs, however I soon rediscovered a Kamailio limitation regarding support for Diameter Routing Agents.
You see, when Kamailio’s C Diameter Peer module makes a decision as to where to route a request, it looks for the active Diameter peers, and finds a peer with the suitable Vendor and Application IDs in the supported Applications for the Application needed.
Unfortunately, a DRA typically only advertises support for one application – Relay.
This means if you have everything connected via a DRA, Kamailio’s CDP module doesn’t see the Application / Vendor ID for the Diameter application on the DRA, and doesn’t route the traffic to the DRA.
The fix for this was twofold, the first step was to add some logic into Kamailio to determine if the Relay application was advertised in the Capabilities Exchange Request / Answer of the Diameter Peer.
I added the logic to do this and exposed this so you can see if the peer supports Diameter relay when you run “cdp.list_peers”.
With that out of the way, next step was to update the routing logic to not just reject the candidate peer if the Application / Vendor ID for the required application was missing, but to evaluate if the peer supports Diameter Relay, and if it does, keep it in the game.
I added this functionality, and now I’m able to use CDP Peers in Kamailio to allow my P-CSCF, S-CSCF and I-CSCF to route their traffic via a Diameter Routing Agent.
If you work with IMS or Packet Core, there’s a good chance you need DNS to work, and it doesn’t always.
When I run traces, I’ve always found I get swamped with DNS traffic, UE traffic, OS monitoring, updates, etc, all combine into a big firehose – while my Wireshark filters for finding EPC and IMS traffic is pretty good, my achilles heel has always been filtering the DNS traffic to just get the queries and responses I want out of it.
Well, today I made that a bit better.
By adding this to your Wireshark filter:
dns contains 33:67:70:70:6e:65:74:77:6f:72:6b:03:6f:72:67:00
You’ll only see DNS Queries and Responses for domains at the 3gppnetwork.org domain.
This makes my traces much easier to read, and hopefully will do the same for you!
Bonus, here’s my current Wireshark filter for working EPC/IMS:
(diameter and diameter.cmd.code != 280) or (sip and !(sip.Method == "OPTIONS") and !(sip.CSeq.method == "OPTIONS")) or (smpp and (smpp.command_id != 0x00000015 and smpp.command_id != 0x80000015)) or (mgcp and !(mgcp.req.verb == "AUEP") and !(mgcp.rsp.rspcode == 500)) or isup or sccp or rtpevent or s1ap or gtpv2 or pfcp or (dns contains 33:67:70:70:6e:65:74:77:6f:72:6b:03:6f:72:67:00)
Recently I had a strange issue I thought I’d share.
Using Kamailio as an Interrogating-CSCF, Kamailio was getting the S-CSCF details from the User-Authorization-Answer’s “Server-Name” (602) AVP.
The value was set to:
sip:scscf.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org:5060
But the I-CSCF was only looking up A-Records for scscf.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org, not using DNS-SRV.
The problem? The Server-Name I had configured as a full SIP URI in PyHSS including the port, meant that Kamailio only looks up the A-Record, and did not do a DNS-SRV lookup for the domain.
Dropping the port number saw all those delicious SRV records being queried.
Something to keep in mind if you use S-CSCF pooling with a Kamailio based I-CSCF, if you want to use SRV records for load balancing / traffic sharing, don’t include the port, and if instead you want it to go to the specified host found by an A-record, include the port.
So the other day I needed to extract the IP and Port parameters from an SDP body – Not the whole line mind, but the values themselves.
As with so many things in Kamailio, there’s a lot of ways to achieve an outcome, but here’s how I approached this problem.
Using the SDPops module we can get a particular line in the SDP, for example, we can get the media line with:
#Get SDP line starting with m= and put it into AVP $avp(mline)
sdp_get_line_startswith("$avp(mline)", "m=")
#Print value of $avp(mline)
xlog("m-line: $avp(mline)\n");
This gets us the line, but now we need to extract the data, in the example from the screenshot the M line has the value:
m=audio 4002 RTP/AVP 8 101
But we only want the port from the M line.
This is where I’ve used the Kamailio Dialplan module and regex to extract the port from this line.
With a fairly simple regex pattern, we can get a group match for the Port from the m= line.
So I took this regular expression, and put it into the Kamailio Dialplan database with dialplan ID 400 for this example:
INSERT INTO `dialplan` VALUES (4,400,10,1,'m=audio (\\d*)',0,'m=audio (\\d*)','\\1','SDP M Port Stripper');
Now using Dialplan ID 400 we can translate an inputted m= SDP line, and get back the port used, so let’s put that into practice:
if(sdp_get_line_startswith("$avp(mline)", "m=")) {
xlog("m-line: $avp(mline)\n");
xlog("raw: $avp(mline)");
xlog("Extracting Port from Media Line");
dp_translate("400", "$avp(mline)/$avp(m_port_b_leg)");
xlog("Translated m_port_b_leg is: $avp(m_port_b_leg)");
}
Now we have an AVP called $avp(m_port_b_leg) which contains the RTP Port from the SDP.
Now we’ve got a few other values we might want to get, such as the IP the RTP is to go to, etc, we can extract this in the same way, with Dialplans and store them as AVPs:
#Print current SDP Values and store as Vars
if(sdp_get_line_startswith("$avp(mline)", "m=")) {
xlog("m-line: $avp(mline)\n");
xlog("raw: $avp(mline)");
xlog("Extracting Port from Media Line");
dp_translate("400", "$avp(mline)/$avp(m_port_b_leg)");
xlog("Translated m_port_b_leg is: $avp(m_port_b_leg)");
}
if(sdp_get_line_startswith("$avp(oline)", "o=")) {
xlog("o-line: $avp(oline)\n");
dp_translate("401", "$avp(oline)/$avp(o_line_port_1)");
xlog("O Line Port 1: $avp(o_line_port_1)");
dp_translate("402", "$avp(oline)/$avp(o_line_port_2)");
xlog("O Line Port 2: $avp(o_line_port_2)");
dp_translate("403", "$avp(oline)/$avp(o_ip_b_leg)");
xlog("O IP: $avp(o_ip_b_leg)");
}
And all the Regex you’ll need:
INSERT INTO `dialplan` VALUES
(4,400,10,1,'m=audio (\\d*)',0,'m=audio (\\d*)','\\1','SDP M Port Stripper'),
(5,401,10,1,'o=[^ ]* (\\d*) (\\d*) IN IP4 (\\d*.d*.\\d*.\\d*)',0,'o=[^ ]* (\\d*) (\\d*) IN IP4 (\\d*.d*.\\d*.\\d*)','\\1','O Port 1'),
(6,402,10,1,'o=[^ ]* (\\d*) (\\d*) IN IP4 (\\d*.d*.\\d*.\\d*)',0,'o=[^ ]* (\\d*) (\\d*) IN IP4 (\\d*.d*.\\d*.\\d*)','\\2','O Port 2'),
(7,403,10,1,'o=[^ ]* (\\d*) (\\d*) IN IP4 (\\d*.d*.\\d*.\\d*)',0,'o=[^ ]* (\\d*) (\\d*) IN IP4 (\\d*[.]\\d*[.]\\d*[.]\\d*)','\\3','O IP');
This was a rebuild, another P-CSCF was running fine and handling traffic with the same DNS server set.
I checked the netplan config and confirmed the DNS server was set correctly.
If I did an nslookup on the address that was failing to resolve – pointing it at the correct DNS server, the A & SRV records came back OK, and everything was fine.
Stranger still, after clearing the DNS Cache, and running a packet capture, I couldn’t see any DNS queries at all….
The problem? Kamailio uses resolv.conf by default on Ubuntu Server, and that was pointing to localhost.
After updating resolv.conf to point to the DNS server handling the IMS domains, I was good to go again.
Recently I’ve been doing some work with FreeSWITCH as an IMS Conference Factory, I’ve written a bit about it before in this post on using FreeSWITCH with the AMR codec.
Pretty early on in my testing I faced a problem with subsequent in-dialog responses, like re-INVITEs used for holding the calls.
Every subsequent message, was getting a “420 Bad Extension” response from FreeSWITCH.
The ReINVITEThe 420 Bad Extension Response
So what didn’t it like and why was FreeSWITCH generating 420 Bad Extension Responses to these subsequent messages?
Well, the “Extensions” FreeSWITCH is referring to are not extensions in the Telephony sense – as in related to the Dialplan, like an Extension Number to identify a user, but rather the Extensions (as in expansions) to the SIP Protocol introduced for IMS.
The re-INVITE contains a Require header with sec-agree which is a SIP Extension introduced for IMS, which FreeSWITCH does not have support for, and the re-INVITE says is required to support the call (Not true in this case).
Using a Kamailio based S-CSCF means it is easy to strip these Headers before forwarding the requests onto the Application Server, which is what I’ve done, and bingo, no more errors!
In iOS 15, Apple added support for iPhones to support SMS over IMS networks – SMSoIP. Previously iPhone users have been relying on CSFB / SMSoNAS (Using the SGs interface) to send SMS on 4G networks.
Getting this working recently led me to some issues that took me longer than I’d like to admit to work out the root cause of…
I was finding that when sending a Mobile Termianted SMS to an iPhone as a SIP MESSAGE, the iPhone would send back the 200 OK to confirm delivery, but it never showed up on the screen to the user.
The GSM A-I/F headers in an SMS PDU are used primarily for indicating the sender of an SMS (Some carriers are configured to get this from the SIP From header, but the SMS PDU is most common).
The RP-Destination Address is used to indicate the destination for the SMS, and on all the models of handset I’ve been testing with, this is set to the MSISDN of the Subscriber.
But some devices are really finicky about it’s contents. Case in point, Apple iPhones.
If you send a Mobile Terminated SMS to an iPhone, like the one below, the iPhone will accept and send back a 200 OK to this request.
The problem is it will never be displayed to the user… The message is marked as delivered, the phone has accepted it it just hasn’t shown it…
SMS reports as delivered by the iPhone (200 OK back) but never gets displayed to the user of the phone as the RP-Destination Address header is populated
The fix is simple enough, if you set the RP-Destination Address header to 0, the message will be displayed to the user, but still took me a shamefully long time to work out the problem.
RP-Destination Address set to 0 sent to the iPhone, this time it’ll get displayed to the user.
I’ve become a big fan of Redis, and recently I had a need to integrate it into Kamailio.
There are two modules for integrating Kamailio and Redis, each have different functionalities:
db_redis is used when you want to use Redis in lieu of MySQL, PostGres, etc, as the database backend, this would be useful for services like usrloc. Not all queries / function calls are supported, but can be used as a drop-in replacement for a lot of modules that need database connectivity.
ndb_redis exposes Redis functions from the Kamailio config file, in a much more generic way. That’s what we’ll be looking at today.
The setup of the module is nice and simple, we load the module and then define the connection to the Redis server:
With the above we’ve created a connection to the Redis server at 127.0.0.2, and it’s called MyRedisServer.
You can define multiple connections to multiple Redis servers, just give each one a different name to reference.
Now if we want to write some data to Redis (SET) we can do it from within the dialplan with:
redis_cmd("MyRedisServer", "SET foo bar", "r");
We can then get this data back with:
#Get value of key "foo" from Redis
redis_cmd("MyRedisServer", "GET foo", "r");
#Set avp "foo_value" to output from Redis
$avp(foo_value) = $redis(r=>value);
#Print out value of avp "foo_value" to syslog
xlog("Value of foo is: $avp(foo_value))
At the same time, we can view this data in Redis directly by running:
nick@oldfaithful:~$ redis-cli GET foo
Likewise we can set the value of keys and the keys themselves from AVPs from within Kamailio:
#Set the Redis Key to be the Received IP, with the value set to the value of the AVP "youravp"
redis_cmd("MyRedisServer", "SET $ct $avp(youravp)", "r");
All of the Redis functions are exposed through this mechanism, not just get and set, for example we can set the TTL so a record deletes after a set period of time:
#Set key with value of the received IP to expire after 120 seconds
redis_cmd("MyRedisServer", "EXPIRE $ct 120", "r");
I recently used Redis for a distributed flooding prevention mechanism, where the Subscriber’s received IP is used as the key in Redis and the value set to the number of failed auth attempts that subscriber has had, by using Redis we’re able to use the same mechanism across different platforms and easily administer it.
The SIP RFC allows for multiple SIP headers to have the same name,
For example, it’s very common to have lots of Via headers present in a request.
In Kamailio, we often may wish to add headers, view the contents of headers and perform an action or re-write headers (Disclaimer about not rewriting Vias as that goes beyond the purview of a SIP Proxy but whatever).
Let’s look at a use case where we have multiple instances of the X-NickTest: header, looking something like this:
INVITE sip:[email protected]:5061 SIP/2.0
X-NickTest: ENTRY ONE
X-NickTest: ENTRY TWO
X-NickTest: ENTRY THREE
...
Let’s look at how we’d access this inside Kamailio.
First, we could just use the psedovariable for header – $hdr()
xlog("Value of X-NickTest is: $hdr(X-NickTest)");
But this would just result in the first entry being printed out:
Value of X-NickTest is: ENTRY ONE
If we know how many instances there are of the header, we can access it by it’s id in the array, for example:
xlog("Value of first X-NickTest is: $hdr(X-NickTest)[0]");
xlog("Value of second X-NickTest is: $hdr(X-NickTest)[1]");
xlog("Value of third X-NickTest is: $hdr(X-NickTest)[2]");
But we may not know how many to expect either, but we can find out using $hdrc(name) to get the number of headers returned.
xlog("X-NickTest has $hdrc(X-NickTest) entries");
You’re probably seeing where I’m going with this, the next logical step is to loop through them, which we can also do something like this:
$var(i) = 0;
while($var(i) < $hdrc(X-NickTest)) {
xlog(X-NickTest entry [$var(i)] has value $hdrc(X-NickTest)[$var(i)]);
$var(i) = $var(i) + 1;
}
Recently I was working on a project that required Kamailio to constantly re-evaluate something, and generate a UAC request if the condition was met.
There’s a few use cases for this: For example you might want to get Kamailio to constantly check the number of SIP registrations and send an alert if they drop below a certain number. If a subscriber drops out in that their Registration just expires, there’s no SIP message that will come in to tell us, so we’d never be able to trigger something in the normal Kamailio request_route.
Of you might want to continually send a SIP MESSAGE to pop up on someone’s phone to drive them crazy. That’s what this example will focus on.
This is where the rtimer module comes in. You can define the check in a routing block, and then
So once we’ve got an ENUM server configured and confirmed we can query it and get the results we want using Dig, we can configure Kamailio.
But before we get to the Kamailio side, a word on how Kamailio handles DNS, Kamailio doesn’t have the ability to set a DNS server, instead it uses the system DNS server details, This means your system will need to use the DNS server we want to query for ENUM for all DNS traffic, not just for Kamailio. This means you may need to setup Recursion to still be able to query DNS records for the outside world.
To add support to Kamailio, we’ll need to load the enum module (enum.so),
In terms of parameters, all we’ll set is the doman_suffix, which is, as it sounds, the domain suffix used in the DNS queries. If you’re using a different domain for your ENUM it’d need to be reflected here.
modparam("enum", "domain_suffix", "e164.arpa.")
Next up inside our minimalist dialplan we’ll just add enum_query(); to query the SIP URI,
if(is_method("INVITE")){
enum_query();
xlog("Ran ENUM query");
xlog("To URI $tU");
forward();
}
Obviously in production you’d want to add more sanity checks and error handling, but with this, sending a SIP INVITE to Kamailio with an E.164 number in the SIP URI user part, will lead to an ENUM query resolving this, and routing the traffic to it,
I’d been trying for some time to get Kamailio acting as a Diameter Routing Agent with mixed success, and eventually got it working, after a few changes to the codebase of the ims_diameter_server module.
It is rather unstable, in that if it fails to dispatch to a Diameter peer, the whole thing comes crumbling down, but incoming Diameter traffic is proxied off to another Diameter peer, and Kamailio even adds an extra AVP.
Having used Kamailio for so long I was really hoping I could work with Kamailio as a DRA as easily as I do for SIP traffic, but it seems the Diameter module still needs a lot more love before it’ll be stable enough and simple enough for everyone to use.
I created a branch containing the fixes I made to make it work, and with an example config for use, but use with caution. It’s a long way from being production-ready, but hopefully in time will evolve.
Instead of going to all the effort of creating VMs (or running Ansible playbooks) we can use Docker and docker-compose to create a test environment with multiple Asterisk instances to dispatch traffic to from Kamailio.
I covered the basics of using Kamailio with Docker in this post, which runs a single Kamailio instance inside Docker with a provided config file, but in this post we’ll use docker-compose to run multiple Asterisk instances and setup Kamailio to dispatch traffic to them.
I am a big Kubernetes fan, and yes, all this can be done in Kubernetes, and would be a better fit for a production environment, but for a development environment it’s probably overkill.
#Copy the config file onto the Filesystem of the Docker instance
COPY dispatcher.list /etc/kamailio/
COPY kamailio.cfg /etc/kamailio/
The Kamailio config we’re using is very similar to the Dispatcher example but with a few minor changes to the timers and setting it to use the Dispatcher data from a text file instead of a database. If you have a look at the contents of dispatcher.list you’ll see three entries; dispatcher_w_docker_asterisk_1, dispatcher_w_docker_asterisk_2 & dispatcher_w_docker_asterisk_3. These will be the hostnames of the 3 Asterisk instances we’ll create.
Next up we’ll take a look at the docker-compose file, which defines how our environment will be composed, and defines which containers will be run
The docker-compose file contains definitions about the Containers we want to run, for this example we’ll run several Asterisk instances and a single Kamailio instance.
The replicas: 6 parameter is ignored by standard docker-compose up command, but will be used if you’re using Docker swarm, otherwise we’ll manually set the number of replicas when we run the command.
So with that defined let’s define our Kamailio service;
So far with most of our discussions about Kamailio we’ve talked about routing the initial SIP request (INVITE, REGISTER, SUBSCRIBE, etc), but SIP is not a one-message protocol, there’s a whole series of SIP messages that go into a SIP Dialog.
Sure the call may start with an INVITE, but there’s the 180 RINGING, the 200 OK and the ACK that go into getting the call actually established, and routing these in-dialog messages is just as important as routing the first INVITE.
When we’ve talked about SIP routing it’s all happened in the request_route {} block:
request_route {
xlog("Received $rm to $ru - Forwarding");
append_hf("X-Proxied: You betcha\r\n");
#Forward to new IP
forward("192.168.1.110");
}
In the example above we statelessly forward any initial requests to the IP 192.168.1.110.
We can add an onreply_route{} block to handle any replies from 192.168.1.110 back to the originator.
But why would we want to?
Some simple answers would be to do some kind of manipulation to the message – say to strip a Caller ID if CLIP is turned off, or to add a custom SIP header containing important information, etc.
onreply_route{
xlog("Got a reply $rs");
append_hf("X-Proxied: For the reply\r\n");
}
Let’s imagine a scenario where the destination our SIP proxy is relaying traffic to (192.168.1.110) starts responding with 404 error.
We could detect this in our onreply_route{} and do something about it.
onreply_route{
xlog("Got a reply $rs");
if($rs == 404) {
#If remote destination returns 404
xlog("Got a 404 for $rU");
#Do something about it
}
}
In the 404 example if we were using Dispatcher it’s got easily accessed logic to handle these scenarios a bit better than us writing it out here, but you get the idea.
There are a few other special routes like onreply_route{}, failure routes and event routes, etc.
Hopefully now you’ll have a better idea of how and when to use onreply_route{} in Kamailio.
It’s a seemingly simple question, the answer to which is – however you want, sorry if that’s not a simple answer.
I’ve talked about the strengths and weaknesses of Kamailio and Asterisk in my post Kamailio vs Asterisk, so how about we use them to work together?
The State of Play
So before we go into the nitty gritty, let’s imagine we’ve got an Asterisk box with a call queue with Alice and Bob in it, set to ring those users if they’re not already on a call.
Each time a call comes in, Asterisk looks at who in the queue is not already on a call, and rings their phone.
Now let’s imagine we’re facing a scenario where the single Asterisk box we’ve got is struggling, and we want to add a second to share the load.
We do it, and now we’ve got two Asterisk boxes and a Kamailio load balancer to split the traffic between the two boxes.
Now each time a call comes in, Kamailio sends the SIP INVITE to one of the two Asterisk boxes, and when it does, that Asterisk box looks at who is in the queue and not already on a call, and then rings their phone.
Let’s imagine a scenario where a Alice & Bob are both on calls on Asterisk box A, and another call comes in this call is routed to Asterisk box B. Asterisk box B looks at who is in the queue and who is already on a call, the problem is Alice and Bob are on calls on Asterisk box A, so Asterisk box B doesn’t know they’re both on a call and tries to ring them.
We have a problem.
Scaling stateful apps is a real headache,
So have a good long hard think about how to handle these issues before going down this path!
Want more telecom goodness?
I have a good old fashioned RSS feed you can subscribe to.
