Tag Archives: LTE

PS Data Off

EPC, LTE, Mobile Networks, SDM, SIM Cards, , ,

Imagine a not-too distant future, one without flying cars – just one where 2G and 3G networks have been switched off.

And the imagine a teenage phone user, who has almost run out of their prepaid mobile data allocation, and so has switched mobile data off, or a roaming scenario where the user doesn’t want to get stung by an unexpectedly large bill.

In 2G/3G networks the Circuit Switched (Voice & SMS) traffic was separate to the Packet Switched (Mobile Data).

This allowed users to turn of mobile data (GPRS/HSDPA), etc, but still be able to receive phone calls and send SMS, etc.

With LTE, everything is packet switched, so turning off Mobile Data would cut off VoLTE connectivity, meaning users wouldn’t be able to make/recieve calls or SMS.

In 3GPP Release 14 (2017) 3GPP introduced the PS Data Off feature.

This feature is primarily implemented on the UE side, and simply blocks uplink user traffic from the UE, while leaving other background IP services, such as IMS/VoLTE and MMS, to continue working, even if mobile data is switched off.

The UE can signal to the core it is turning off PS Data, but it’s not required to, so as such from a core perspective you may not know if your subscriber has PS Data off or not – The default APN is still active and in the implementations I’ve tried, it still responds to ICMP Pings.

IMS Registration stays in place, SMS and MMS still work, just the UE just drops the requests from the applications on the device (In this case I’m testing with an Android device).

What’s interesting about this is that a user may still find themselves consuming data, even if data services are turned off. A good example of this would be push notifications, which are sent to the phone (Downlink data). The push notification will make it to the UE (or at least the TCP SYN), after all downlink services are not blocked, however the response (for example the SYN-ACK for TCP) will not be sent. Most TCP stacks when ignored, try again, so you’ll find that even if you have PS Data off, you may still use some of your downlink data allowance, although not much.

The SIM EF 3GPPPSDATAOFF defines the services allowed to continue flowing when PS Data is off, and the 3GPPPSDATAOFFservicelist EF lists which IMS services are allowed when PS Data is off.

Usually at this point, I’d include a packet capture and break down the flow of how this all looks in signaling, but when I run this in my lab, I can’t differentiate between a PS Data Off on the UE and just a regular bearer idle timeout… So have an irritating blinking screenshot instead…

The PLMN Problem for Private LTE / 5G

5G SA, EPC, EUTRAN, LTE, Mobile Networks, RFCs & Standards, SDM, Security, SIM Cards, , , ,

So it’s the not to distant future and the pundits vision of private LTE and 5G Networks was proved correct, and private networks are plentiful.

But what PLMN do they use?

The PLMN (Public Land Mobile Network) ID is made up of a Mobile Country Code + Mobile Network Code. MCCs are 3 digits and MNCs are 2-3 digits. It’s how your phone knows to connect to a tower belonging to your carrier, and not one of their competitors.

For example in Australia (Mobile Country Code 505) the three operators each have their own MCC. Telstra as the first licenced Mobile Network were assigned 505/01, Optus got 505/02 and VHA / TPG got 505/03.

Each carrier was assigned a PLMN when they started operating their network. But the problem is, there’s not much space in this range.

The PLMN can be thought of as the SSID in WiFi terms, but with a restriction as to the size of the pool available for PLMNs, we’re facing an IPv4 exhaustion problem from the start if we’re facing an explosion of growth in the space.

Let’s look at some ways this could be approached.

Everyone gets a PLMN

If every private network were to be assigned a PLMN, we’d very quickly run out of space in the range. Best case you’ve got 3 digits, so only space for 1,000 networks.

In certain countries this might work, but in other areas these PLMNs may get gobbled up fast, and when they do, there’s no more. New operators will be locked out of the market.

Loaner PLMNs

Carriers already have their own PLMNs, they’ve been using for years, some kit vendors have been assigned their own as well.

If you’re buying a private network from an existing carrier, they may permit you to use their PLMN,

Or if you’re buying kit from an existing vendor you may be able to use their PLMN too.

But what happens then if you want to move to a different kit vendor or another service provider? Do you have to rebuild your towers, reconfigure your SIMs?

Are you contractually allowed to continue using the PLMN of a third party like a hardware vendor, even if you’re no longer purchasing hardware from them? What happens if they change their mind and no longer want others to use their PLMN?

Everyone uses 999 / 99

The ITU have tried to preempt this problem by reallocating 999/99 for use in Private Networks.

The problem here is if you’ve got multiple private networks in close proximity, especially if you’re using CBRS or in close proximity to other networks, you may find your devices attempting to attach to another network with the same PLMN but that isn’t part of your network,

Mobile Country or Geographical Area Codes
Note from TSB
Following the agreement on the Appendix to Recommendation ITU-T E.212 on “shared E.212 MCC 999 for internal use within a private network” at the closing plenary of ITU-T SG2 meeting of 4 to 13 July 2018, upon the advice of ITU-T Study Group 2, the Director of TSB has assigned the Mobile Country Code (MCC) “999” for internal use within a private network. 

Mobile Network Codes (MNCs) under this MCC are not subject to assignment and therefore may not be globally unique. No interaction with ITU is required for using a MNC value under this MCC for internal use within a private network. Any MNC value under this MCC used in a network has
significance only within that network. 

The MNCs under this MCC are not routable between networks. The MNCs under this MCC shall not be used for roaming. For purposes of testing and examples using this MCC, it is encouraged to use MNC value 99 or 999. MNCs under this MCC cannot be used outside of the network for which they apply. MNCs under this MCC may be 2- or 3-digit.

(Recommendation ITU-T E.212 (09/2016))

The Crystal Ball?

My bet is we’ll see the ITU allocate an MCC – or a range of MCCs – for private networks, allowing for a pool of PLMNs to use.

When deploying networks, Private network operators can try and pick something that’s not in use at the area from a pool of a few thousand options.

The major problem here is that there still won’t be an easy way to identify the operator of a particular network; the SPN is local only to the SIM and the Network Name is only present in the NAS messaging on an attach, and only after authentication.

If you’ve got a problem network, there’s no easy way to identify who’s operating it.

But as eSIMs become more prevalent and BIP / RFM on SIMs will hopefully allow operators to shift PLMNs without too much headache.

How UEs get Time in LTE

EPC, LTE, Mobile Networks, , ,

You may have noticed in the settings on your phone the time source can be set to “Network”, but what does this actually entail and how is this information transferred?

The answer is actually quite simple,

In the NAS PDU of the Downlink NAS Transport message from the MME to the UE, is the Time Zone & Time field, which contains (unsuprisingly) the Timezone and Time.

Time is provided in UTC form with the current Timezone to show the offset.

This means that in the configuration for each TAC on your MME, you have to make sure that the eNBs in that TAC have the Timezone set for the location of the cells in that TAC, which is especially important when working across timezones.

There is no parameter for the date/time when Daylight savings time may change. But as soon as a UE goes Idle and then comes out of Idle mode, it’ll be given the updated timezone information, and during handovers the network time is also provided.
This means if you were using your phone at the moment when DST begins / ends you’d only see the updated time once the UE toggles into/out of Idle mode, or when performing a tracking-area update.

IMS Routing with iFCs

5G SA, EPC, IMS / VoLTE, LTE, Mobile Networks, SDM, VoIP, , , , ,

SIP routing is complicated, there’s edge cases, traffic that can be switched locally and other traffic that needs to be proxied off to another Proxy or Application server. How can you define these rules and logic in a flexible way, that allows these rules to be distributed out to multiple different network elements and adjusted on a per-subscriber basis?

Enter iFCs – The Initial Filter Criteria.

iFCs are XML encoded rules to define which servers should handle traffic matching a set of rules.

Let’s look at some example rules we might want to handle through iFCs:

  • Send all SIP NOTIFY, SUBSCRIBE and PUBLISH requests to a presence server
  • Any Mobile Originated SMS to an SMSc
  • Calls to a specific destination to a MGC
  • Route any SIP INVITE requests with video codecs present to a VC bridge
  • Send calls to Subscribers who aren’t registered to a Voicemail server
  • Use 3rd party registration to alert a server that a Subscriber has registered

All of these can be defined and executed through iFCs, so let’s take a look,

iFC Structure

iFCs are encoded in XML and typically contained in the Cx-user-data AVP presented in a Cx Server Assignment Answer response.

Let’s take a look at an example iFC and then break down the details as to what we’re specifying.

<InitialFilterCriteria>
    <Priority>10</Priority>
    <TriggerPoint>
        <ConditionTypeCNF>1</ConditionTypeCNF>
        <SPT>
            <ConditionNegated>0</ConditionNegated>
            <Group>0</Group>
            <Method>MESSAGE</Method>
        </SPT>
        <SPT>
            <ConditionNegated>0</ConditionNegated>
            <Group>1</Group>
            <SessionCase>0</SessionCase>
        </SPT>
    </TriggerPoint>
    <ApplicationServer>
        <ServerName>sip:smsc.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org:5060</ServerName>
        <DefaultHandling>0</DefaultHandling>
    </ApplicationServer>
</InitialFilterCriteria>

Each rule in an iFC is made up of a Priority, TriggerPoint and ApplicationServer.

So for starters we’ll look at the Priority tag.
The Priority tag allows us to have multiple-tiers of priority and multiple levels of matching,
For example if we had traffic matching the conditions outlined in this rule (TriggerPoint) but also matching another rule with a lower priority, the lower priority rule would take precedence.

Inside our <TriggerPoint> tag contains the specifics of the rules and how the rules will be joined / matched, which is what we’ll focus on predominantly, and is followed by the <ApplicationServer> which is where we will route the traffic to if the TriggerPoint is matched / triggered.

So let’s look a bit more about what’s going on inside the TriggerPoint.

Each TriggerPoint is made up of Service Point Trigger (SPTs) which are individual rules that are matched or not matched, that are either combined as logical AND or logical OR statements when evaluated.

By using fairly simple building blocks of SPTs we can create a complex set of rules by joining them together.

Service Point Triggers (SPTs)

Let’s take a closer look at what goes on in an SPT.
Below is a simple SPT that will match all SIP requests using the SIP MESSAGE method request type:

        <SPT>
            <ConditionNegated>0</ConditionNegated>
            <Group>0</Group>
            <Method>MESSAGE</Method>
        </SPT>

So as you may have guessed, the <Method> tag inside the SPT defines what SIP request method we’re going to match.

But Method is only one example of the matching mechanism we can use, but we can also match on other attributes, such as Request URI, SIP Header, Session Case (Mobile Originated vs Mobile Terminated) and Session Description such as SDP.

Or an example of a SPT for anything Originating from the Subscriber utilizing the <SessionCase> tag inside the SPT.

        <SPT>
            <ConditionNegated>0</ConditionNegated>
            <Group>0</Group>
            <SessionCase>0</SessionCase>
        </SPT>

Below is another SPT that’s matching any requests where the request URI is sip:[email protected] by setting the <RequestURI> tag inside the SPT:

        <SPT>
            <ConditionNegated>0</ConditionNegated>
            <Group>0</Group>
            <RequestURI>sip:[email protected]</RequestURI>
        </SPT>

We can match SIP headers, either looking for the existence of a header or the value it is set too,

        <SPT>
            <ConditionNegated>0</ConditionNegated>
            <Group>0</Group>
            <SIPHeader>
              <Header>To</Header>
              <Content>"Nick"</Content>
            </SIPHeader>
        </SPT>

Having <Header> will match if the header is present, while the optional Content tag can be used to match

In terms of the Content this is matched using Regular Expressions, but in this case, not so regular regular expressions. 3GPP selected Extended Regular Expressions (ERE) to be used (IEEE POSIX) which are similar to the de facto standard PCRE Regex, but with a few fewer parameters.

Condition Negated

The <ConditionNegated> tag inside the SPT allows us to do an inverse match.

In short it will match anything other than what is specified in the SPT.

For example if we wanted to match any SIP Methods other than MESSAGE, setting <ConditionNegated>1</ConditionNegated> would do just that, as shown below:

        <SPT>
            <ConditionNegated>1</ConditionNegated>
            <Group>0</Group>
            <Method>MESSAGE</Method>
        </SPT>

And another example of ConditionNegated in use, this time we’re matching anything where the Request URI is not sip:[email protected]:

        <SPT>
            <ConditionNegated>1</ConditionNegated>
            <Group>0</Group>
            <RequestURI>sip:[email protected]</RequestURI>
        </SPT>

Finally the <Group> tag allows us to group together a group of rules for the purpose of evaluating.
We’ll go into it more in in the below section.

ConditionTypeCNF / ConditionTypeDNF

As we touched on earlier, <TriggerPoints> contain all the SPTs, but also, very importantly, specify how they will be interpreted.

SPTs can be joined in AND or OR conditions.

For some scenarios we may want to match where METHOD is MESSAGE and RequestURI is sip:[email protected], which is different to matching where the METHOD is MESSAGE or RequestURI is sip:[email protected].

This behaviour is set by the presence of one of the ConditionTypeCNF (Conjunctive Normal Form) or ConditionTypeDNF (Disjunctive Normal Form) tags.

If each SPT has a unique number in the GroupTag and ConditionTypeCNF is set then we evaluate as AND.

If each SPT has a unique number in the GroupTag and ConditionTypeDNF is set then we evaluate as OR.

Let’s look at how the below rule is evaluated as AND as ConditionTypeCNF is set: 

<InitialFilterCriteria>
    <Priority>10</Priority>
    <TriggerPoint>
        <ConditionTypeCNF>1</ConditionTypeCNF>
        <SPT>
            <ConditionNegated>0</ConditionNegated>
            <Group>0</Group>
            <Method>MESSAGE</Method>
        </SPT>
        <SPT>
            <ConditionNegated>0</ConditionNegated>
            <Group>1</Group>
            <SessionCase>0</SessionCase>
        </SPT>
    </TriggerPoint>
    <ApplicationServer>
        <ServerName>sip:smsc.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org:5060</ServerName>
        <DefaultHandling>0</DefaultHandling>
    </ApplicationServer>
</InitialFilterCriteria>

This means we will match if the method is MESSAGE and Session Case is 0 (Mobile Originated) as each SPT is in a different Group which leads to “and” behaviour.

If we were to flip to ConditionTypeDNF each of the SPTs are evaluated as OR.

<InitialFilterCriteria>
    <Priority>10</Priority>
    <TriggerPoint>
        <ConditionTypeDNF>1</ConditionTypeDNF>
        <SPT>
            <ConditionNegated>0</ConditionNegated>
            <Group>0</Group>
            <Method>MESSAGE</Method>
        </SPT>
        <SPT>
            <ConditionNegated>0</ConditionNegated>
            <Group>1</Group>
            <SessionCase>0</SessionCase>
        </SPT>
    </TriggerPoint>
    <ApplicationServer>
        <ServerName>sip:smsc.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org:5060</ServerName>
        <DefaultHandling>0</DefaultHandling>
    </ApplicationServer>
</InitialFilterCriteria>

This means we will match if the method is MESSAGE and Session Case is 0 (Mobile Originated).

Where this gets a little bit more complex is when we have multiple entries in the same Group tag.

Let’s say we have a trigger point made up of:

<SPT><Method>MESSAGE</Method><Group>1</Group></SPT>
<SPT><SessionCase>0</SessionCase><Group>1</Group></SPT> 

<SPT><Header>P-Some-Header</Header><Group>2</Group></SPT>

How would this be evaluated?

If we use ConditionTypeDNF every SPT inside the same Group are matched as AND, and SPTs with distinct are matched as OR.

Let’s look at our example rule evaluated as ConditionTypeDNF:

<ConditionTypeDNF>1</ConditionTypeDNF>
  <SPT><Method>MESSAGE</Method><Group>1</Group></SPT>
  <SPT><SessionCase>0</SessionCase><Group>1</Group></SPT> 

  <SPT><Header>P-Some-Header</Header><Group>2</Group></SPT>

This means the two entries in Group 1 are evaluated as AND – So Method is message and Session Case is 0, OR the header “P-Some-Header” is present.

Let’s do another one, this time as ConditionTypeCNF:

<ConditionTypeCNF>1</ConditionTypeCNF>
  <SPT><Method>MESSAGE</Method><Group>1</Group></SPT>
  <SPT><SessionCase>0</SessionCase><Group>1</Group></SPT> 

  <SPT><Header>P-Some-Header</Header><Group>2</Group></SPT>

This means the two entries in Group 1 are evaluated as OR – So Method is message OR Session Case is 0, AND the header “P-Some-Header” is present.

Pre-5G Network Slicing

5G SA, EPC, EUTRAN, GSM, LTE, Mobile Networks, RFCs & Standards, , , , ,

Network Slicing, is a new 5G Technology. Or is it?

Pre 3GPP Release 16 the capability to “Slice” a network already existed, in fact the functionality was introduced way back at the advent of GPRS, so what is so new about 5G’s Network Slicing?

Network Slice: A logical network that provides specific network capabilities and network characteristics

3GPP TS 123 501 / 3 Definitions and Abbreviations

Let’s look at the old and the new ways, of slicing up networks, pre release 16, on LTE, UMTS and GSM.

Old Ways: APN Separation

The APN or “Access Point Name” is used so the SGSN / MME knows which gateway to that subscriber’s traffic should be terminated on when setting up the session.

APN separation is used heavily by MVNOs where the MVNO operates their own P-GW / GGSN.
This allows the MNVO can handle their own rating / billing / subscriber management when it comes to data.
A network operator just needs to setup their SGSN / MME to point all requests to setup a bearer on the MVNO’s APN to the MNVO’s gateways, and presoto, it’s no longer their problem.

Later as customers wanted MPLS solutions extended over mobile (Typically LTE), MNOs were able to offer “private APNs”.
An enterprise could be allocated an APN by the MNO that would ensure traffic on that APN would be routed into the enterprise’s MPLS VRF.
The MNO handles the P-GW / GGSN side of things, adding the APN configuration onto it and ensuring the traffic on that APN is routed into the enterprise’s VRF.

Different QCI values can be assigned to each APN, to allow some to have higher priority than others, but by slicing at an APN level you lock all traffic to those QoS characteristics (Typically mobile devices only support one primary APN used for routing all traffic), and don’t have the flexibility to steer which networks which traffic from a subscriber goes to.

It’s not really practical for everyone to have their own APNs, due in part to the namespace limitations, the architecture of how this is usually done limits this, and the simple fact of everyone having to populate an APN unique to them would be a real headache.

5G replaces APNs with “DNNs” – Data Network Names, but the functionality is otherwise the same.

In Summary:
APN separation slices all traffic from a subscriber using a special APN and provide a bearer with QoS/QCI values set for that APN, but does not allow granular slicing of individual traffic flows, it’s an all-or-nothing approach and all traffic in the APN is treated equally.

The old Ways: Dedicated Bearers

Dedicated bearers allow traffic matching a set rule to be provided a lower QCI value than the default bearer. This allows certain traffic to/from a UE to use GBR or Non-GBR bearers for traffic matching the rule.

The rule itself is known as a “TFT” (Traffic Flow Template) and is made up of a 5 value Tuple consisting of IP Source, IP Destination, Source Port, Destination Port & Protocol Number. Both the UE and core network need to be aware of these TFTs, so the traffic matching the TFT can get the QCI allocated to it.

This can be done a variety of different ways, in LTE this ranges from rules defined in a PCRF or an external interface like those of an IMS network using the Rx interface to request a dedicated bearers matching the specified TFTs via the PCRF.

Unlike with 5G network slicing, dedicated bearers still traverse the same network elements, the same MME, S-GW & P-GW is used for this traffic. This means you can’t “locally break out” certain traffic.

In Summary:
Dedicated bearers allow you to treat certain traffic to/from subscribers with different precedence & priority, but the traffic still takes the same path to it’s ultimate destination.

Old Ways: MOCN

Multi-Operator Core Network (MOCN) allows multiple MNOs to share the same active (tower) infrastructure.

This means one eNodeB can broadcast more than one PLMN and server more than one mobile network.

This slicing is very coarse – it allows two operators to share the same eNodeBs, but going beyond a handful of PLMNs on one eNB isn’t practical, and the PLMN space is quite limited (1000 PLMNs per country code max).

In Summary:
MOCN allows slicing of the RAN on a very coarse level, to slice traffic from different operators/PLMNs sharing the same RAN.

Its use is focused on sharing RAN rather than slicing traffic for users.

The Surprisingly Complicated world of MO SMS in IMS/VoLTE

EPC, GSM, IMS / VoLTE, LTE, Mobile Networks, RFCs & Standards, , , ,

Since the beginning of time, SIP has used the 2xx responses to confirm all went OK.

If you thought sending an SMS in a VoLTE/IMS network would see a 2xx OK response and then that’s the end of it, you’d be wrong.

So let’s take a look into sending SMS over VoLTE/IMS networks!

So our story starts with the Subscriber sending an SMS, which generate a SIP MESSAGE.

The Content-Type of this SIP MESSAGE is set to application/vnd.3gpp.sms rather than Text, and that’s because SMS over IMS uses the Short Message Transfer Protocol (SM-TP) inherited from GSM.

The Short Message Transfer Protocol (SM-TP) (Not related to Simple Message Transfer Protocol used in Email clients) is made up of Transfer Protocol Data Units (TPDU) that contain our message information, even though we have the Destination in our SIP headers, it’s again defined in the SM-TP body.

At first this may seem like a bit of duplication, but this allows older SMS Switching Centers (SMSc) to add support for IMS networks without any major changes, just what the SM-TP payload is wrapped up in changes.

SIP MESSAGE Request Body encoded in SM-TP

So back to our SIP MESSAGE request, typed out by the Subscriber, the UE sends this a SIP MESSAGE onto our IMS Network.

The IMS network follows it’s IFCs and routing rules, and makes it to the termination points for SMS traffic – the SMSc.

The SMSc sends back either a 200 OK or a 202 Accepted, and you’d think that’s the end of it, but no.

Our Subscriber still sees “Sending” on the screen, and the SMS is not shown as sent yet.

Instead, when the SMS has been delivered or buffered, relayed, etc, the SMSc generates a new SIP request, (as in new Call-ID / Dialog) with the request type MESSAGE, addressed to the Subscriber.

The payload of this request is another application/vnd.3gpp.sms encoded request body, again, containing SM-TP encoded data.

When the UE receives this, it will then consider the message delivered.

SM-TP encoded Delivery Report

Of course things change slightly when delivery reports are enabled, but that’s another story!

Open5Gs Logo

Open5Gs Database Schema Change

5G SA, EPC, LTE, Mobile Networks, SDM, Software, , , ,

As Open5Gs has introduced network slicing, which led to a change in the database used,

Alas many users had subscribers provisioned in the old DB schema and no way to migrate the SDM data between the old and new schema,

If you’ve created subscribers on the old schema, and now after the updates your Subscriber Authentication is failing, check out this tool I put together, to migrate your data over.

The Open5Gs Python library I wrote has also been updated to support the new schema.

PyHSS Update – SCTP Support

EPC, LTE, Mobile Networks, Python, , , , , ,

Pleased to announce that PyHSS now supports SCTP for transport.

If you’re not already aware SCTP is the surprisingly attractive cousin of TCP, that addresses head of line blocking and enables multi-homing,

The fantastic PySCTP library from P1sec made adding this feature a snap. If you’re looking to add SCTP to a Python project, it’s surprisingly easy,

A seperate server (hss_sctp.py) is run to handle SCTP connections, and if you’re looking for Multihoming, we got you dawg – Just edit the config file and set the bind_ip list to include each of your IPs to multi home listen on.

MTU in LTE & 5G Transmission Networks – Part 1

5G SA, EPC, LTE, Mobile Networks, , , ,

Every now and then when looking into a problem I have to really stop and think about how things work low down, that I haven’t thought about for a long time, and MTU is one of those things.

I faced with an LTE MTU issue recently I thought I’d go back and brush up on my MTU knowhow and do some experimenting.

Note: This is an IPv4 discussion, IPv6 does not support fragmentation.

The very, very basics

MTU is the Maximum Transmission Unit.

In practice this is the largest datagram the layer can handle, and more often than not, this is based on a physical layer constraint, in that different physical layers can only stuff so much into a frame.

“The Internet” from a consumer perspective typically has an MTU of 1500 bytes or perhaps a bit under depending on their carrier, such as 1472 bytes.
SANs in data centers typically use an MTU of around 9000 bytes,
Out of the box, most devices if you don’t specify, will use an MTU of 1500 bytes.

As a general rule, service providers typically try to offer an MTU as close to 1500 as possible.

Messages that are longer than the Maximum Transmission Unit need to be broken up in a process known as “Fragmenting”.
Fragmenting allows large frames to be split into smaller frames to make their way across hops with a lower MTU.

All about Fragmentation

So we can break up larger packets into smaller ones by Fragmenting them, so case closed on MTU right? Sadly not.

Fragmentation leads to reduced efficiency – Fragmenting frames takes up precious CPU cycles on the router performing it, and each time a frame is broken up, additional overhead is added by the device breaking it up, and by the receiver to reassemble it.

Fragmentation can happen multiple times across a path (Multi-Stage Fragmentation).
For example if a frame is sent with a length of 9000 bytes, and needs to traverse a hop with an MTU of 4000, it would need to be fragmented (broken up) into 3 frames (Frame 1 and Frame 2 would be ~4000 bytes long and frame 3 would be ~1000 bytes long).
If it then needs to traverse another hop with an MTU of 1500, then the 3 fragmented frame would each need to be further fragmented, with the first frame of ~4000 bytes being split up into 3 more fragmented frames.
Lost track of what just happened? Spare a thought for the routers having to to do the fragmentation and the recipient having to reassemble their packets.

Fragmented frames are reassembled by the end recipient, other devices along the transmission path don’t reassemble packets.

In the end it boils down to this trade off:
The larger the packet can be, the more user data we can stuff into each one as a percentage of the overall data. We want the percentage of user data for each packet to be as high as can be.
This means we want to use the largest MTU possible, without having to fragment packets.

Overhead eats into our MTU

A 1500 byte MTU that has to be encapsulated in IPsec, GTP or PPP, is no longer a 1500 byte MTU as far as the customer is concerned.

Any of these encapsulation techniques add overhead, which shrinks the MTU available to the end customer.

Keep in mind we’re going to be encapsulating our subscriber’s data in GTP before it’s transmitted across LTE/NR, and this means we’ll be adding:

  • 8 bytes for the GTP header
  • 8 bytes for the transport UDP header
  • 20 bytes for the transport IPv4 header
  • 14 bytes if our transport is using Ethernet

This means we’ve got 50 bytes of transmission / transport overhead. This will be important later on!

How do subscribers know what to use as MTU?

Typically when a subscriber buys a DSL service or HFC connection, they’ll either get a preconfigured router from their carrier, or they will be given a list of values to use that includes MTU.

LTE and 5G on the other hand tell us the value we should use.

Inside the Protocol Configuration Options in the NAS PDU, the UE requests the MTU and DNS server to be used, and is provided back from the network.

This MTU value is actually set on the MME, not the P-GW. As the MME doesn’t actually know the maximum MTU of the network, it’s up to the operator to configure this to be a value that represents the network.

Why this Matters for LTE & 5G Transmission

As we covered earlier, fragmentation is costly. If we’re fragmenting packets we are:

  • Wasting resources on our transmission network / core networks – as we fragment Subscriber packets it’s taking up compute resources and therefore limiting throughput
  • Wasting radio resources as additional overhead is introduced for fragmented packets, and additional RBs need to be scheduled to handle the fragmented packets

To test this I’ve setup a scenario in the lab, and we’ll look at the packet captures to see how the MTU is advertised, and see how big we can make our MTU on the subscriber side.

Enable GPS/GLONASS Sync on Huawei BTS3900

EUTRAN, Mobile Networks, , , , , ,

Our BTS is going to need an accurate clock source in order to run, so without access to crazy accurate Timing over Packet systems or TDM links to use as reference sources, I’ve opted to use the GPS/GLONASS receiver built into the LMPT card.

Add new GPS with ID 0 on LMPT in slot 7 of cabinet 1:

ADD GPS: GN=0, CN=1, SRN=7, CABLE_LEN=3, MODE=GPS/GLONASS;

Check GPS has sync (May take some time) using the Display GPS command;

DSP GPS: GN=0;

Assuming you’ve got an antenna connected and can see the sky, after ~10 minutes running the DSP GPS:; command again should show you an output like this:

+++    4-PAL0089624        2020-11-28 01:06:55
O&M    #806355684
%%DSP GPS: GN=0;%%
RETCODE = 0  Operation succeeded.

Display GPS State
-----------------
                 GPS Clock No.  =  0
                GPS Card State  =  Normal
                 GPS Card Type  =  M12M
                 GPS Work Mode  =  GPS
                   Hold Status  =  UNHOLDED
         GPS Satellites Traced  =  4
     GLONASS Satellites Traced  =  0
         BDS Satellites Traced  =  0
Antenna Longitude(1e-6 degree)  =  144599999
 Antenna Latitude(1e-6 degree)  =  -37000000
           Antenna Altitude(m)  =  613
         Antenna Angle(degree)  =  5
             Link Active State  =  Activated
              Feeder Delay(ns)  =  15
                   GPS Version  =  NULL
(Number of results = 1)


---    END

Showing the GPS has got sync and a location fix,

Next we set BTS to use GPS as time source,

SET TIMESRC: TIMESRC=GPS;

Finally we’ll verify the Time is in sync on the BTS using the list time command:

DSP TIME:;
+++    4-PAL0089624        2020-11-28 01:09:22
O&M    #806355690
%%DSP TIME:;%%
RETCODE = 0  Operation succeeded.

Time Information
----------------
Time  =  2020-11-28 01:09:22 GMT+00:00

---    END

Optionally you may wish to add a timezone, using the SET TZ:; command, but I’ve opted to keep it in UTC for simplicity.

Power cables feeding Ericsson RBS rack

Cell Broadcast in LTE

EPC, EUTRAN, LTE, Mobile Networks, RFCs & Standards, , ,

Recently I’ve been wrapping my head around Cell Broadcast in LTE, and thought I’d share my notes on 3GPP TS 38.413.

The interface between the MME and the Cell Broadcast Center (CBC) is the SBc interface, which as two types of “Elementary Procedures”:

  • Class 1 Procedures are of the request – response nature (Request followed by a Success or Failure response)
  • Class 2 Procedures do not get a response, and are informational one-way. (Acked by SCTP but not an additional SBc message).

SCTP is used as the transport layer, with the CBC establishing a point to point connection to the MME over SCTP (Unicast only) on port 29168 with SCTP Payload Protocol Identifier 24.

The SCTP associations between the MME and the CBC should normally remain up – meaning the SCTP association / transport connection is up all the time, and not just brought up when needed.

Elementary Procedures

Write-Replace Warning (Class 1 Procedure)

The purpose of Write-Replace Warning procedure is to start, overwrite the broadcasting of warning message, as defined in 3GPP TS 23.041 [14].

Write-Replace Warning procedure, initiated by WRITE-REPLACE WARNING REQUEST sent by the CBC to the MMEs contains the emergency message to be broadcast and the parameters such as TAC to broadcast to, severity level, etc.

A WRITE-REPLACE WARNING RESPONSE is sent back by the MME to the MME, if successful, along with information as to where it was sent out. CBC messages are unacknowledged by UEs, meaning it’s not possible to confirm if a UE has actually received the message.

The request includes the message identifier and serial number, list of TAIs, repetition period, number of broadcasts requested, warning type, and of course, the warning message contents.

Stop Warning Procedure (Class 1 Procedure)

Stop Warning Procedure, initiated by STOP WARNING REQUEST and answered with a STOP WARNING RESPONSE, requests the MME inform the eNodeBs to stop broadcasting the CBC in their SIBs.

Includes TAIs of cells this should apply to and the message identifier,

Error Indication (Class 2)

The ERROR INDICATION is used to indicate an error (duh). Contains a Cause and Criticality IEs and can be sent by the MME or CBC.

Write Replace Warning (Class 2)

The WRITE REPLACE WARNING INDICATION is used to indicate warning scenarios for some instead of a WRITE-REPLACE WARNING RESPONSE,

PWS Restart (Class 2)

The PWS RESTART INDICATION is used to list the eNodeBs / cells, that have become available or have restarted, since the CBC message and have no warning message data – for example eNodeBs that have just come back online during the period when all the other cells are sending Cell Broadcast messages.

Returns a the Restarted-Cell-List IE, containing the Global eNB ID IE and List of TAI, of the restarted / reconnected cells.

PWS Failure Indication (Class 2)

The PWS FAILURE INDICATION is essentially the reverse of PWS RESTART INDICATION, indicating which eNodeBs are no longer available. These cells may continue to send Cell Broadcast messages as the MME has essentially not been able to tell it to stop.

Contains a list of Failed cells (eNodeBs) with the Global-eNodeB-ID of each.

Huawei BTS 3900 LMPT Basic Config

EUTRAN, LTE, Mobile Networks, , , , , , ,

This post is one in a series documenting my adventures attempting to configure a used BTS 3900 to function as a eNB in my lab.

There are 5 network ports on the LMPT card:

  • 2x SFP cages – SFP 0 and SFP 1
  • 1x 10/100 Ethernet port – ETH – Used to access the Local Maintenance terminal
  • 2x Fe/Ge ports – Fe/Ge0 and Fe/Ge1

Configuring the Ethernet Ports

What took me a little while to realise is that SFP0 and Fe/Ge0 are paired, they’re really only one interface. This means you can only use one at a time – you can’t use SFP0 and Fe/Ge0 simultaneously- Same with SFP1 and Fe/Ge1.

Before we get started we’ll list the current interfaces:

DSP ETHPORT:;

Assuming the interfaces aren’t there, we’ll need to add the interfaces, in my case the LMPT card is in Chassis 1, Slot number 7.

ADD ETHPORT: SRN=1, SN=7, SBT=BASE_BOARD, PN=0, PA=AUTO, SPEED=AUTO, DUPLEX=AUTO, USERLABEL="SFP_Fe_Ge_0";
ADD ETHPORT: SRN=1, SN=7, SBT=BASE_BOARD, PN=1, PA=AUTO, SPEED=AUTO, DUPLEX=AUTO, USERLABEL="SFP_Fe_Ge_1";

And then we’ve got to add an IP to one of the interfaces, in the below example I’ve added 10.0.1.210/24 to port 0 (which can be either SFP0 or Fe/Ge0).

ADD DEVIP: SRN=1, SN=7, SBT=BASE_BOARD, PT=ETH, PN=0, IP="10.0.1.210", MASK="255.255.255.0", USERLABEL="SFP_Fe/Ge_0";

At this point I plugged into the Fe/Ge0 port into my switch, and from my laptop on the same 10.0.1.0/24 subnet, I was able to ping the eNodeB.

And now we can check the status of the port:

DSP ETHPORT: SRN=1, SN=7, SBT=BASE_BOARD, PN=0;
+++    4-PAL0089624        2020-11-28 00:19:13
O&M    #806355532
%%DSP ETHPORT: SRN=1, SN=7, SBT=BASE_BOARD;%%
RETCODE = 0  Operation succeeded.

DSP ETHPORT Result
------------------
                           Cabinet No.  =  0
                           Subrack No.  =  1
                              Slot No.  =  7
                         Subboard Type  =  Base Board
                              Port No.  =  0
                        Port Attribute  =  Copper
                           Port Status  =  Up
                 Physical Layer Status  =  Up
       Maximum Transmission Unit(byte)  =  1500
                             ARP Proxy  =  Enable
                          Flow Control  =  Open
                           MAC Address  =  DCD2-07FC-A9E8
                       Loopback Status  =  No Loop
               In Loopback Mode or Not  =  No
                 Ethernet OAM 3AH Flag  =  Disable
          Number of RX Packets(packet)  =  1682
              Number of RX Bytes(byte)  =  163929
Number of RX CRC Error Packets(packet)  =  2
                    RX Traffic(byte/s)  =  259
          Number of TX Packets(packet)  =  53
              Number of TX Bytes(byte)  =  13952
                    TX Traffic(byte/s)  =  0
  Local Configuration Negotiation Mode  =  Automatic Negotiation
         Local Actual Negotiation Mode  =  Automatic Negotiation
                           Local Speed  =  100M
                          Local Duplex  =  Full Duplex
          Peer Actual Negotiation Mode  =  Automatic Negotiation
                            Peer Speed  =  100M
                           Peer Duplex  =  Full Duplex
                         Number of IPs  =  1
                       IP Address List  =  10.0.1.210 255.255.255.0
(Number of results = 1)


---    END

On with the rest of the config,

Adding a default route:

ADD IPRT: RTIDX=0, SRN=1, SN=7, SBT=BASE_BOARD, DSTIP="0.0.0.0", DSTMASK="0.0.0.0", RTTYPE=NEXTHOP, NEXTHOP="10.0.1.1", MTUSWITCH=OFF, DESCRI="Default Route";

Setting a DNS Server:

ADD DNSSRV: DNSSRVID=0, IPVER=IPv4, DNSCIP4="10.0.1.210", DNSSIP4="1.1.1.1";

Ensure you can ping the DNS server & in my case the MME:

PING: SRN=1, SN=7, SRCIP="10.0.1.210", DSTIP="1.1.1.1", CONTPING=DISABLE, APPTIF=NO;
PING: SRN=1, SN=7, SRCIP="10.0.1.210", DSTIP="10.0.1.183", CONTPING=DISABLE, APPTIF=NO;

And with that, you’ve got the network side of the config done on the eNodeB.

At this stage you’re able to unplug from the ETH port you’ve got the WebLMT connection to, and just connect to it like any other network device.

There’s a few more steps before we bring cells on the air, we’ve got to set timing sources, configure a connection to an MME and S-GW, configure the Carrier settings and add the radios and sectors, but this will get you to the stage where you no longer need to plug directly into the eNB to configure it.

Huawei BTS3900 – MML Basics

EUTRAN, LTE, Mobile Networks, RF, , , , , , , , ,

How do humans talk to base stations? For Huawei at least the answer to this is through MML – Man-Machine-Language,

It’s command-response based, which is a throwback to my Nortel days (DMS100 anyone?),

So we’re not configuring everything through a series of parameters broken up into sections with config, it’s more statements to the BTS along the lines of “I want you to show me this”, or “Please add that” or “Remove this bit”,

The instruction starts of with an operation word, telling the BTS what we want to do, there’s a lot of them, but some common examples are; DSP (Display), LST (List), SET (Set), MOD (Modify) and ADD (Add).

After the operation word we’ve got the command word, to tell the BTS on what part we want to execute this command,

A nice simple example would be to list the software version that’s running on the BTS. For this we’d run

LST SOFTWARE:;

And press F9 to execute, which will return a list of software on the BTS and show it in the terminal.

Note at the end the :; – the : (colon) denotes the end of a command word, and after it comes the paratmeters for the command, and then the command ends with the ; (semi-colon). We’ll need to put this after every command.

Let’s look at one more example, and then we’ll roll up our sleves and get started.

Note: I’m trying out GIFs to share screen recordings instead of screenshots. Please let me know if you’re having issues with them.

So once you’ve logged into WebLMT, selecting MML is where we’ll do all our config, let’s log in and list the running applications.

So far we’ve only got some fairly basic data, listing and displaying values, so let’s try something a bit more complex, taking a backup of the config, in encrypted mode, with the backup label “blogexamplebackup”,

BKP CFGFILE: ENCRYPTMODE=UNENCRYPTED, BL="blogexamplebackup";

If you’ve made it this far there’s a good chance you’re thinking there’s no way you can remember all these commands and parameters – But I’ve got some good news, we don’t really need to remember anything, there’s a form for this!

And if we want to upload the backup file to an FTP server, we can do this as well, in the navigation tree we find Upload Backup Configuration, fill in the fields and click the Exec button to execute the command, or press F9.

These forms, combined with a healthy dose of the search tab, allow us to view and configure our BTS.

I’ve still got a lot to learn about getting end-to-end configuration in place, but this seems like a good place to start,

Indoor LTE/GSM/UMTS mobile antennas, primarily used for in building coverage.

DIY RAN Adventures – Antennas

EUTRAN, LTE, Mobile Networks, RF, , , ,

Note: This is one part of a series of posts where I cover my adventures attempting to bring on air a commercial Macro cell site for my lab, with scrounged components.

So the Huawei BTS3900 unit I’ve ended up with, is only one part of the overall picture for building a working LTE RAN. Power systems, feeders, connectors, CPRI, antennas, baseband processing and transmission are all hurdles I’ve still got to overcome. So today, let’s talk about antennas!

For the output/TX side (downlink) of the RF Unit, I’ve ordered some 25w 50 ohm dummy loads (I’ll still need to work out how to turn down the RF power to less than 25w on the RF units). Even with the dummy load, a tiny bit of RF power is leaked, which should be enough to provide the downlink signal for my UEs – Time will tell if this works…

This option is fine for the power being pushed out of the RF unit, into the dummy load, where we have a lot of power available (too much power), but what about our very weak uplink signals from UEs?

For this I’d need some decent antennas to pickup the signals from the UEs, so I ended up with some Kathrein (Now owned by Ericsson) indoor multi-band omni antennas I found on an online auction site for $10 each. (I bought 4 so I can play with MIMO.)

Unfortunately, the RFUs I have are Band 28 (roughly 700Mhz-750Mhz uplink and 758Mhz to 798Mhz downlink), and reading the datasheet it seems this doesn’t cover the bands I need;

But beggars can’t be choosers, so I ran a calibration on the NanoVNA and swept the antenna from 700Mhz-750Mhz (Band 28 uplink frequencies) to see how it will perform when I get the rest of the solution together;

At the upper end of Band 28 Uplink (748Mhz) I’m getting a fairly respectable VSWR of 1.6 (Return Loss of -12.4dB), so I should be able to get away with these for what I’m doing,

I’v seen these white domes inside shopping centers and office buildings, so I was keen to crack open the case and see what magic inside, what I found was kind of underwhelming, just an aluminum plate with an aluminum reflector cone…

My ideas of putting the parts into the lathe and trying to lower it’s operating frequency by taking material off, were dashed when I realised taking material off would raise the operating frequency, not lower it…

Huawei BBU (Baseband Unit) for LTE/UMTS/GSM also known as the BTS 3900 / BBU 3900

My used Huawei BTS3900 LTE RAN Adventure – The Impulse Purchase

EUTRAN, LTE, Mobile Networks, , , , , ,

Meta: The Australian government made up it’s mind some time ago that Huawei would be blacklisted from providing equipment for 5G networks.
Several other countries have adopted the same policy in regards, and as such, deployed Huawei tech is being replaced, and some of it filters down to online auction sites…

So I kind of purchased an item described as “Huawei BBU3900” with a handful of unknown cards and 2 LRFU units, for just over $100.

My current lab setup is a single commercial picocell and a draw of SDR hardware that works with mixed results, so the idea of having a commercial macro cell to play with seemed like a great idea, I put lowball offer in and the seller accepted.

Now would be a good time to point out I don’t know much about RAN and it’s been a long time since I’ve been working on power systems, so this is shaping up to be a fun project.

  • Huawei BBU3900
    Photo from the listing
  • Photo from the listing

I did a Huawei RAN course years ago and remembered the rough ingredients required for LTE:

  1. You needed either RRUs (Remote Radio Units) or RFUs (Radio Frequency Units) to handle the RF side of things.
    RRUs are designed for outdoor use (such as mounting on the tower) and RFUs are designed for indoor use, like mounting in a cabinet.
    I’ve ended up with two LRFUe units, which I can join together for 2x MIMO, operate on Band 28 and can put out a whopping 80W of transmit power, yes I’m going to need some big attenuators…
  2. You need a Baseband Processor card to tell the Radio units what do do.
    The card connects the CPRIs (Typically optic fiber links) between the radio units and the baseband.
    The chassis I purchased came with a stack of WBBP (For WCDMA) cards and a single LBBP card for LTE. The LBBP card has 6 SFP ports for the CPRI interfaces, which is more than enough for my little lab. (You can also daisy-chain CPRIs so I’m not even limited to 6 Radio Units.)
  3. You need a backplane and a place for the cards to live – this is the BBU3900 chassis. It’s got basic switching to allow communication between cards, a chassis to distribute power and cooling.
    (Unlike the Ericson units there is actually a backplane for communications in the Huawei chassis – the Ericsson RBS series has is just power and cooling in the chassis)
  4. Optional – Dedicated transmission card, I’ve ended up with a Universal Transmission Processor (UTRP9) with 2x Gig Ethernet and 2x Fast Ethernet ports for transmission. This will only work for GSM and UMTS though, not LTE, so not much use for me.
  5. You need something to handle main processing (LTE / Universal Main Processing and Transmission Unit (LMPT / UMPT)).
    Unfortunately the unit I’ve ended up with only came with a WMPT (For WCDMA), so back online to find either an LMPT (LTE) or UMPT (Universal (2G/3G/4G))…
  6. You need a Universal Power and Environment Module (UPEU) to power up the chassis and handle external IO for things like temperature alarms, door sensors and fire detectors. This chassis has two for redundancy / extra IO & extra power capacity.

So in order to get this running I still need quite a few components:

  • Attenuators – I’ll be able to turn the power down, sure, but not to the levels required to be legal.
  • Antennas – These are FDD units, so I’ll need two antennas for each RFU, on Band 28
  • Feeder Cables – To connect the antennas
  • SMF cables and SFPs – I’ve got a pile in my toolbox, but I’ll need to work out what’s supported by these units
  • A big -48vDC rectifier (I got the BBU3900 unit powered up with an existing supply I had, but I’m going to need something bigger for the power hungry RFUs)
  • DC Distribution Unit – Something to split the DC between the RFUs and the BBU, and protect against overload / short
  • USB-Network adapter – For OAM access to the unit – Found these cheaply online and got one on the way
  • The LTE Main Processing & Transmission (LMPT) card – Ordered a second hand one from another seller

I powered up the BTA3900 and sniffed the traffic, and can see it trying to reach an RNC.

Unfortunately with no open source RNC options I won’t be posting much on the topic of UMTS or getting the UMTS/WCDMA side of things on the air anytime soon…

So that’s the start of the adventure.

I don’t know if I’ll get this all working, but I’m learning a lot in the process, and that’s all that really matters…

Note: I think this is the course I did from Huawei on the BBU3900…

LTE EPC: Serving Gateway (S-GW) Basic Function

EPC, LTE, Mobile Networks, , , , ,

As our subscribers are mobile, moving between base stations / cells, the destination of the incoming GTP-U packets needs to be updated every time the subscriber moves from one cell to another.

If you’re not familiar with GTP take a read of this primer.

As we covered in the last post, the Packet Gateway (P-GW) handles decapsulating and encapsulating this traffic into GTP from external networks, and vise-versa. The Packet Gateway sends the traffic onto a Serving Gateway, that forwards the GTP-U traffic onto the eNodeB serving the user.

So why not just route the traffic from the Packet Gateway directly to the eNodeB?

As our users are inherently mobile, the signalling load to keep updating the destination of the incoming GTP-U traffic to the correct eNB, would put an immense load on the P-GW. So an intermediary gateway – the Serving Gateway (S-GW), is introduced.

The S-GW handles the mobility between cells, and takes the load of the P-GW. The P-GW just hands the traffic to a S-GW and let’s the S-GW handle the mobility.

It’s worth keeping in mind that most LTE connections are not “always on”. Subscribers (UEs) go into “Idle Mode”, in which the data connection and the radio connection is essentially paused, and able to be bought back at a moments notice (this allows us to get better battery life on the UE and better frequency utilisation).

When a user enters Idle Mode, an incoming packet needs to be buffered until the Subscriber/UE can get paged and come back online. Again this function is handled by the S-GW; buffering packets until the UE comes available then forwarding them on.

Wireshark Filtering S1AP to find Subscriber Signaling

EPC, Mobile Networks, SDM,

The S1 interface can be pretty noisy, which makes it hard to find the info you’re looking for.

So how do we find all the packets relating to a single subscriber / IMSI amidst a sea of S1 packets?

The S1 interface only contains the IMSI in certain NAS messages, so the first step in tracing a subscriber is to find the initial attach request from that subscriber containing the IMSI.

Luckily we can filter in Wireshark to find the IMSI we’re after;

e212.imsi == "001010000000001"

The Wireshark e212 filter filters for ITU-T E.212 payloads (ITU-T E.212 is the spec for PLMN identifiers).

Quick note – Not all IntialUEMessages will contain the IMSI – If the subscriber has already established comms with the MME it’ll instead be using a temporary identifier – M-TMSI, unless you’ve got a way to see the M-TMSI -> IMSI mapping on the MME you’ll be out of luck.

Next up let’s take a look at the contents of one of these packets,

Inside the protocolIEs is the MME_UE_S1AP_ID – This unique identifier will identify all S1 signalling for a single user.

The MME_UE_S1AP_ID is a unique identifier, assigned by the MME to identify which signaling messages are for which subscriber.

(It’s worth noting the MME_UE_S1AP_ID is only unique to the MME – If you’ve got multiple MMEs the same MME_UE_S1AP_ID could be assigned by each).

So now we have the MME_UE_S1AP_ID, we can filter all S1 messaging containing that MME_UE_S1AP_ID, we’ll use this Wireshark filter to get it:

s1ap.MME_UE_S1AP_ID == 2

Boom, there’s a all the signalling for that subscriber.

Alternatively you can just right click on the value and apply it as a filter instead of typing everything in,

Hopefully that’ll help you filter to find what you’re looking for!

List of Open Source Evolved Packet Core (EPC) Implementations

EPC, LTE, Mobile Networks, Software, , , , , , ,

Open5Gs

Formerly NextEPC.

OpenAI Core Network

Related to / branched from OMEC.

Magma

Based on OMEC, with a focus on Fixed Wireless more than mobile.

Not fair to consider it just an EPC, Magma is highly scaleable and designed with a focus on Fixed Wireless offerings.

Supported by the Facebook Telecom Infra Project.

OMEC – Open Evolved Mobile Core

Supported by Open Networking Foundation, Sprint and several other large players.

OMEC has each Network Element in it’s own repo in GitHub and each is managed by a different team.

OpenMME – MME

In use by at least one commercial operator (in some capacity).

Next Generation Infrastructure Core (S-GW & P-GW)

Seems to only compile on 16.04 and not really

c3po – HSS / CDR / CTF

OpenCORD

srsEPC

(from the guys who produced srsLTE / srsENB / srsUE)

Getting TEID up with GTP Tunnels

EPC, GSM, LTE, Mobile Networks, Uncategorized, , , , , ,

If you’re using an GSM / GPRS, UMTS, LTE or NR network, there’s a good chance all your data to and from the terminal is encapsulated in GTP.

GTP encapsulates user’s data into a GTP PDU / packet that can be redirected easily. This means as users of the network roam around from one part of the network to another, the destination IP of the GTP tunnel just needs to be updated, but the user’s IP address doesn’t change for the duration of their session as the user’s data is in the GTP payload.

One thing that’s a bit confusing is the TEID – Tunnel Endpoint Identifier.

Each tunnel has a sender TEID and transmitter TEID pair, as setup in the Create Session Request / Create Session Response, but in our GTP packet we only see one TEID.

There’s not much to a GTP-U header; at 8 bytes in all it’s pretty lightweight. Flags, message type and length are all pretty self explanatory. There’s an optional sequence number, the TEID value and the payload itself.

So the TEID identifies the tunnel, but it’s worth keeping in mind that the TEID only identifies a data flow from one Network Element to another, for example eNB to S-GW would have one TEID, while S-GW to P-GW would have another TEID.

Each tunnel has two TEIDs, a sending TEID and a receiving TEID. For some reason (Minimize overhead on backhaul maybe?) only the sender TEID is included in the GTP header;

This means a packet that’s coming from a mobile / UE will have one TEID, while a packet that’s going to the same mobile / UE will have a different TEID.

Mapping out TIEDs is typically done by looking at the Create Session Request / Responses, the Create Session Request will have one TIED, while the Create Session Response will have a different TIED, thus giving you your TIED pair.

Viewing the SIB – The LTE System Information Block with SDRs

EUTRAN, LTE, Mobile Networks, , , , , ,

I’ve been experimenting with Inter-RAT & Inter-Frequency handovers recetly, and had an issue where what I thought was configured on the eNB I wasn’t seeing reflected on the UEs.

I understood the Neighbouring Cell reelection parameters are broadcast in the System Information Blocks, but how could I view them?

The answer – srsUE!

I can’t get over how cool the stuff coming out of Software Radio Systems is, but being able to simulate a UE and eNB on SDR hardware is pretty awesome, and also allows you to view low layer traces the vast majority of commercial UEs will never expose to a user.

After running srsUE with the PCAP option I let it scan for networks and find mine. I didn’t actually need to authenticate with the network, just lock to the cell.

Deocoding it using the steps I laid out here for decoding LTE MAC traces in Wireshark, there it all was!

I’ve attached a copy of the pcap here for your reference.