Note: This is one part of a series of posts where I cover my adventures attempting to bring on air a commercial Macro cell site for my lab, with scrounged components.
So the Huawei BTS3900 unit I’ve ended up with, is only one part of the overall picture for building a working LTE RAN. Power systems, feeders, connectors, CPRI, antennas, baseband processing and transmission are all hurdles I’ve still got to overcome. So today, let’s talk about antennas!
For the output/TX side (downlink) of the RF Unit, I’ve ordered some 25w 50 ohm dummy loads (I’ll still need to work out how to turn down the RF power to less than 25w on the RF units). Even with the dummy load, a tiny bit of RF power is leaked, which should be enough to provide the downlink signal for my UEs – Time will tell if this works…
This option is fine for the power being pushed out of the RF unit, into the dummy load, where we have a lot of power available (too much power), but what about our very weak uplink signals from UEs?
For this I’d need some decent antennas to pickup the signals from the UEs, so I ended up with some Kathrein (Now owned by Ericsson) indoor multi-band omni antennas I found on an online auction site for $10 each. (I bought 4 so I can play with MIMO.)
Unfortunately, the RFUs I have are Band 28 (roughly 700Mhz-750Mhz uplink and 758Mhz to 798Mhz downlink), and reading the datasheet it seems this doesn’t cover the bands I need;
But beggars can’t be choosers, so I ran a calibration on the NanoVNA and swept the antenna from 700Mhz-750Mhz (Band 28 uplink frequencies) to see how it will perform when I get the rest of the solution together;
At the upper end of Band 28 Uplink (748Mhz) I’m getting a fairly respectable VSWR of 1.6 (Return Loss of -12.4dB), so I should be able to get away with these for what I’m doing,
I’v seen these white domes inside shopping centers and office buildings, so I was keen to crack open the case and see what magic inside, what I found was kind of underwhelming, just an aluminum plate with an aluminum reflector cone…
My ideas of putting the parts into the lathe and trying to lower it’s operating frequency by taking material off, were dashed when I realised taking material off would raise the operating frequency, not lower it…
Meta: The Australian government made up it’s mind some time ago that Huawei would be blacklisted from providing equipment for 5G networks. Several other countries have adopted the same policy in regards, and as such, deployed Huawei tech is being replaced, and some of it filters down to online auction sites…
So I kind of purchased an item described as “Huawei BBU3900” with a handful of unknown cards and 2 LRFU units, for just over $100.
My current lab setup is a single commercial picocell and a draw of SDR hardware that works with mixed results, so the idea of having a commercial macro cell to play with seemed like a great idea, I put lowball offer in and the seller accepted.
Now would be a good time to point out I don’t know much about RAN and it’s been a long time since I’ve been working on power systems, so this is shaping up to be a fun project.
Photo from the listing
Photo from the listing
I did a Huawei RAN course years ago and remembered the rough ingredients required for LTE:
You needed either RRUs (Remote Radio Units) or RFUs (Radio Frequency Units) to handle the RF side of things. RRUs are designed for outdoor use (such as mounting on the tower) and RFUs are designed for indoor use, like mounting in a cabinet. I’ve ended up with two LRFUe units, which I can join together for 2x MIMO, operate on Band 28 and can put out a whopping 80W of transmit power, yes I’m going to need some big attenuators…
You need a Baseband Processor card to tell the Radio units what do do. The card connects the CPRIs (Typically optic fiber links) between the radio units and the baseband. The chassis I purchased came with a stack of WBBP (For WCDMA) cards and a single LBBP card for LTE. The LBBP card has 6 SFP ports for the CPRI interfaces, which is more than enough for my little lab. (You can also daisy-chain CPRIs so I’m not even limited to 6 Radio Units.)
You need a backplane and a place for the cards to live – this is the BBU3900 chassis. It’s got basic switching to allow communication between cards, a chassis to distribute power and cooling. (Unlike the Ericson units there is actually a backplane for communications in the Huawei chassis – the Ericsson RBS series has is just power and cooling in the chassis)
Optional – Dedicated transmission card, I’ve ended up with a Universal Transmission Processor (UTRP9) with 2x Gig Ethernet and 2x Fast Ethernet ports for transmission. This will only work for GSM and UMTS though, not LTE, so not much use for me.
You need something to handle main processing (LTE / Universal Main Processing and Transmission Unit (LMPT / UMPT)). Unfortunately the unit I’ve ended up with only came with a WMPT (For WCDMA), so back online to find either an LMPT (LTE) or UMPT (Universal (2G/3G/4G))…
You need a Universal Power and Environment Module (UPEU) to power up the chassis and handle external IO for things like temperature alarms, door sensors and fire detectors. This chassis has two for redundancy / extra IO & extra power capacity.
So in order to get this running I still need quite a few components:
Attenuators – I’ll be able to turn the power down, sure, but not to the levels required to be legal.
Antennas – These are FDD units, so I’ll need two antennas for each RFU, on Band 28
Feeder Cables – To connect the antennas
SMF cables and SFPs – I’ve got a pile in my toolbox, but I’ll need to work out what’s supported by these units
A big -48vDC rectifier (I got the BBU3900 unit powered up with an existing supply I had, but I’m going to need something bigger for the power hungry RFUs)
DC Distribution Unit – Something to split the DC between the RFUs and the BBU, and protect against overload / short
USB-Network adapter – For OAM access to the unit – Found these cheaply online and got one on the way
The LTE Main Processing & Transmission (LMPT) card – Ordered a second hand one from another seller
I powered up the BTA3900 and sniffed the traffic, and can see it trying to reach an RNC.
Unfortunately with no open source RNC options I won’t be posting much on the topic of UMTS or getting the UMTS/WCDMA side of things on the air anytime soon…
So that’s the start of the adventure.
I don’t know if I’ll get this all working, but I’m learning a lot in the process, and that’s all that really matters…
As the standardisation for 5G-SA has been completed and the first roll outs are happening, I thought I’d cover the basic architecture of the 5G Core Network, for people with a background in EPC/SAE networks for 4G/LTE, covering the key differences, what’s the same and what’s new.
The AMF – Authentication & Mobility Function, serves much the same role as the MME in LTE/EPC/SAE networks.
Like the MME, the AMF only handles Control Plane traffic, and serves as the gatekeeper to the services on the network, connecting the RAN to the core, authenticating subscribers and starting data / PDN connections for the UEs.
While the MME connects to eNodeBs for RAN connectivity, the AMF connects to gNodeBs for RAN.
The Authentication Functions
In EPC the HSS had two functions; it was a database of all subscribers’ profile information and also the authentication centre for generating authentication vectors.
5GC splits this back into two network elements (Akin to the AuC and HLR in 2G/3G).
The UDM (Unified Data Management) provides the AMF with the subscriber profile information (allowed / barred services / networks, etc),
The AUSF (Authentication Server Function) provides the AMF with the authentication vectors for authenticating subscribers.
Like in UMTS/LTE USIMs are used to authenticate subscribers when connecting to the network, again using AKA (Authentication and Key Agreement) for mutual subscriber & network authentication.
Other authentication methods may be implemented, R16 defines 3 suporrted methods, 5G-AKA, EAP-AKA’, and EAP-TLS.
This opens the door for the 5GC to be used for non-mobile usage. There has been early talk of using the 5G architecture for fixed line connectivity as well as mobile, hence supporting a variety of authentication methods beyond classic AKA & USIMs. (For more info about Non-3GPP Access interworking look into the N3IWF)
The Mobility Functions
When a user connects to the network the AMF selects a SMF (Session Management Function) akin to a P-GW-C in EPC CUPS architecture and requests the SMF setup a connection for the UE.
This is similar to the S11 interface in EPC, however there is no S-GW used in 5GC, so would be more like if S11 were instead sent to the P-GW-C.
The SMF selects a UPF (Akin to the P-GW-C selecting a P-GW-U in EPC), which will handle this user’s traffic, as the UPF bridges external data networks (DNs) to the gNodeB serving the UE.
Moving between cells / gNodeBs is handled in much the same way as done previously, with the path the UPF sends traffic to (N3 interface) updated to point to the IP of the new gNodeB.
When a UE attempts to connect to the network their signalling traffic (Using the N1 reference point between the UE and the AMF), is sent to the AMF.
an authentication challenge is issued as in previous generations.
Upon successful authentication the AMF signals the SMF to setup a session for the UE. The SMF selects a UPF to handle the user plane forwarding to the gNodeB serving the UE.
Key Differences
Functions handled by the MME in EPC now handled by AMF in 5GC
Functions of HSS now in two Network Functions – The UDM (Unified Data Management) and AUSF (Authentication Server Function)
Setting up data connections “flatter” (more info on the User Plane differences can be found here)
Non 3GPP access (Potentially used for fixed-line / non mobile networks)
As the standardisation for 5G-SA has been completed and the first roll outs are happening, I thought I’d cover the basic architecture of the 5G Core Network, for people with a background in EPC/SAE networks for 4G/LTE, covering the key differences, what’s the same and what’s new.
The idea behind this, is that by removing the S-GW removes extra hops / latency in the network, and allows users to be connected to the best UPF for their needs, typically one located close to the user.
However, there are often scenarios where an intermediate function is required – for example wanting to anchor a session to keep an IP Address allocated to one UPF associated with a user, while they move around the network. In this scenario a UPF can act as an “Session Anchor” (Akin to a P-GW), and pass through “Intermediate UPFs” (Like S-GWs).
Unlike the EPCs architecture, there is no limit to how many I-UPFs can be chained together between the Session Anchoring UPF and the gNB, and this chaining of UPFs allows for some funky routing options.
The UPF is dumb by design. The primary purpose is just to encapsulate traffic destined from external networks to subscribers into GTP-U packets and forward them onto the gNodeB serving that subscriber, and the same in reverse. Do one thing and do it well.
SMF – Session Management Function
So with dumb UPFs we need something smarter to tell them what to do.
Control of the UPFs is handled by the SMF – Session Management Function, which signals using PFCP down to the UPFs to tell them what to do in terms of setting up connections.
This means the interface between the SMF and UPF (the N4 interface) is more or less the same as the interface between a P-GW-C and a P-GW-U seen in CUPS.
When a subscriber connects to the network and has been authenticated, the AMF (For more info on the AMF see the sister post to this topic covering Control Plane traffic) requests the SMF to setup a connection for the subscriber.
Interworking with EPC
For deployments with an EPC and 5GC interworking between the two is of course required.
The P-GW-C and P-GW-U communications using PFCP are essentially the same as the N4 interface (between the SMF and the UPF) so the P-GW-U is able to act as a UPF.
This means handovers between the two RATs / Cores is seamless as when moving from an LTE RAT and EPC to a 5G RAT and 5G Core, the same UPF/P-GW-U is used, and only the Control Plane signalling around it changes.
When moving from LTE to 5G RAT, the P-GW-C is replaced by the SMF, When moving from 5G RAT to LTE, the SMF is replaced by the P-GW-C. In both scenarios user plane traffic takes the same exit point to external Data Networks (SGi interface in EPC / N6 interface in 5GC).
Interfaces / Reference Points
N3 Interface
N3 interface connects the gNodeB user plane to the UPF, to transport GTP-U packets.
This is a User Plane interface, and only transports user plane traffic.
This is akin to the S1-UP interface in EPC.
N4 Interface
N4 interface connects the Session Management Function (SMF) control plane to the UPF, to setup, modify and delete UPF sessions.
It is a control plane interface, and does not transport User Plane traffic.
This interface relies on PFCP – Packet Forwarding Control Protocol.
This is akin to the SxB interface in EPC with CUPS.
N6 Interface
N6 interface connects the UPF to External Data Networks (DNs), taking packets destined for Subscribers and encapsulating them into GTP-U packets.
This is a User Plane interface, and only transports user plane traffic.
This is akin to the SGi interface in EPC.
N9 Interface
When Session Anchoring is used, and Intermediate-UPFs are used, the connection between these UPFs uses the N9 interface.
This is only used in certain scenarios – the preference is generally to avoid unnecessary hops, so Intermediate-UPF usage is to be avoided where possible.
As this is a User Plane interface, it only transports user plane traffic.
When used this would be akin to the S5 interface in EPC.
N11 Interface
SMFs need to be told when to setup / tear down connections, this information comes from the AMF via the N11 interface.
As this is a Control Plane interface, it only transports control plane traffic.
This is similar to the S11 interface between the MME and the S-GW in EPC, however it would be more like the S11 if the S11 terminated on the P-GW.
The Packet Gateway connects users of an LTE network to external networks like the Internet, by encapsulating IP packets inside GTP and forwarding them on to reach our subscriber wherever in the network they are.
So we use GTP to encapsulate user’s traffic, making it easy to carry it transparently from outside networks (Like the Internet) to the eNodeB and onto our UE / mobile phones, and more importantly redirect where the user’s traffic it’s going while keeping the same IP address.
But we need a network element to take plain old IP from external networks / Internet, and encapsulate the traffic into the GTP packets we’ll send to the subscriber.
This network element will have to do the same in reverse and decapsulate traffic coming from the subscriber to put it back onto the external networks / Internet.
That’s the role of the Packet Gateway (P-GW). The P-GW sits on the border between the outside network (An interface / reference point known as the SGi Interface) and the rest of the packet core (Serving-Gateway then onto eNodeB & UE) via the S5 Interface.
Let’s look at how the P-GW handles an incoming packet:
An IP packet comes in from the Internet destined for IP 1.2.3.4 and routed to the P-GW.
The P-GW looks up in it’s internal database what Tunnel Endpoint Identifier (TEID) IP Address 1.2.3.4 is associated with.
The P-GW encapsulates the IP packet (Layer 3 & up) into a GTP packet, adding the Tunnel Endpoint Identifier (TEID) to the GTP header.
The P-GW looks up in it’s internal database which Serving Gateway is handling traffic for that TEID.
The P-GW then sends this GTP packet containing our IP packet to the Serving Gateway.
In order to start relaying traffic to/from the S5 & SGi interfaces, the P-GW needs a set of procedures for setting up these sessions, (IP Address allocation and TEID allocation) known as bearers. This is managed using GTPv2 (aka GTPv2-Control Plane / GTPv2-C).
GTPv2-C has a set of procedures for creating these sessions, the key ones used by the P-GW are:
The Create Session Request is sent by the S-GW to the P-GW and contains the APN of the network to be setup, the IP Address to be assigned (if static) and information regarding the maximum throughput the user will be permitted to achieve.
If the P-GW was able to setup the connection as requested, a Create Session Response is sent back to the P-GW, with the IP Address for the UE to use, and the TEID (Tunnel Endpoint Identifier).
At this stage the tunnel is up and ready to go, traffic to the P-GW to the IP of the UE will be encapsulated in GTP-U packets with the TEID for this bearer, and forwarded on to the S-GW serving the user.
As our subscribers are mobile, moving between base stations / cells, the destination of the incoming GTP-U packets needs to be updated every time the subscriber moves from one cell to another.
As we covered in the last post, the Packet Gateway (P-GW) handles decapsulating and encapsulating this traffic into GTP from external networks, and vise-versa. The Packet Gateway sends the traffic onto a Serving Gateway, that forwards the GTP-U traffic onto the eNodeB serving the user.
So why not just route the traffic from the Packet Gateway directly to the eNodeB?
As our users are inherently mobile, the signalling load to keep updating the destination of the incoming GTP-U traffic to the correct eNB, would put an immense load on the P-GW. So an intermediary gateway – the Serving Gateway (S-GW), is introduced.
The S-GW handles the mobility between cells, and takes the load of the P-GW. The P-GW just hands the traffic to a S-GW and let’s the S-GW handle the mobility.
It’s worth keeping in mind that most LTE connections are not “always on”. Subscribers (UEs) go into “Idle Mode”, in which the data connection and the radio connection is essentially paused, and able to be bought back at a moments notice (this allows us to get better battery life on the UE and better frequency utilisation).
When a user enters Idle Mode, an incoming packet needs to be buffered until the Subscriber/UE can get paged and come back online. Again this function is handled by the S-GW; buffering packets until the UE comes available then forwarding them on.
A question that seems to come up often, is how to provide a static IPs to UEs on Open5GS EPC.
By default all UEs are allocated an internal IP that the server the P-GW is running on NATs out, but many users want to avoid NAT, for obvious reasons.
Open5GS has the ability to set a Static IP for each APN a subscriber has, but let’s get one thing out of the way first;
LTE is not Ethernet. No broadcast, no multicast. Each IP Address is best thought of as a single /32 network. This means you can’t have the UEs in your LTE network in the same 192.168.1.x subnet as your home network along with your laptop and printer, it’s not how it works.
So with that out of the way, let’s talk about how to do static IP address allocation in Open5GS EPC.
Assigning a Subscriber a Static IP Address
From the HSS edit the Subscriber and in the UE IPv4 or UE IPv6 address, set the static address you want to use.
You can set any UE IP Address here and it’ll get allocated to that UE.
But – there’s an issue.
The problem is not so much on the Open5GS P-GW implementation, but just how TCP/IP routing works in general.
Let’s say I assign the UE IPv4 address 1.2.3.4 to my UE. From the UE it sends a packet with the IPv4 Source address of 1.2.3.4 to anywhere on the internet, the eNB puts the packet in GTP and eventually the it gets to the P-GW which sends it out onto the internet from the source address 1.2.3.4.
The problem is that the response will never get back to me, as 1.2.3.4 is not allocated to me and will never make it back to my P-GW, so never relayed back to the UE.
For TCP traffic this means I can send the SYN with the source address of 1.2.3.4, but the SYN/ACK will be routed back to the real 1.2.3.4, and not to me, so the TCP socket will never get opened.
So while we can set a static IPs to be allocated to UEs in Open5GS, unless the traffic can be routed back to these IPs it’s not much use.
Routing
So let’s say we have assigned IP 1.2.3.4 to the UE, we’d need to put a static route on our routers to route traffic to the IP of the PGW. In my case the PGW is 10.0.1.121, so I’ll need to add a static route to get traffic destined 1.2.3.4/32 to 10.0.1.121.
In a more common case we’d assign internal IP subnets for the UE pool, and then add routes for the entire subnet to the IP of the PGW.
3GPP release 14 introduced the concept of CUPS – Control & User Plane Separation, and the Sx interface, this allows the control plane (GTP-C) functionality and the user plane (GTP-U) functionality to be separated, and run in a distributed fashion, allowing the node a user’s GTP-U traffic flows through to be in a different location to where the Control / Signalling traffic (GTP-C) flows.
In practice that means for an LTE EPC this means we split our P-GW and S-GW into a minimum of two network elements each.
A P-GW is split and becomes a P-GW-C that handles the P-GW Control Plane traffic (GTPv2-C) and a P-GW-U speaking GTP-U for our User Plane traffic. But the split doesn’t need to stop there, one P-GW-C could control multiple P-GW-Us, routing the user plane traffic. Sames goes for S-GW being split into S-GW-C and S-GW-U,
This would mean we could have a P-GW-U located closer to a eNB / User to reduce latency, by allowing GTP-U traffic to break out on a node closer to the user.
It also means we can scale better too, if we need to handle more data traffic, but not necessarily more control plane traffic, we can just add more P-GW-U nodes to handle this.
To manage this a new protocol was defined – PFCP – the Packet Forwarding Control Protocol. For LTE this is refereed to as the Sx reference point, it’ also reused in 5G-SA as the N4 reference point.
When a GTP-C “Create Session Request” comes into a P-GW for example from an S-GW, a PFCP “Session Establishment Request” is sent by the P-GW-C to the P-GW-U with much the same information that was in the GTP-C request, to setup the session.
So why split the Control and User Plane traffic if you’re going to just relay the GTP-C traffic in a different format?
That was my first question – the answer is that keeping the GTP-C interface ensures backward compatibility with older MMEs, PCRFs, charging systems, and allows a staged roll out and bolting on extra capacity.
GTP-C disappears entirely in 5G Standalone architecture and is replaced with the N4 interface, which uses PFCP for the Control Plan and GTP-U again.
Here’s a capture from Open5Gs core showing GTPv2C and PFCP in play.
The S1 interface can be pretty noisy, which makes it hard to find the info you’re looking for.
So how do we find all the packets relating to a single subscriber / IMSI amidst a sea of S1 packets?
The S1 interface only contains the IMSI in certain NAS messages, so the first step in tracing a subscriber is to find the initial attach request from that subscriber containing the IMSI.
Luckily we can filter in Wireshark to find the IMSI we’re after;
Quick note – Not all IntialUEMessages will contain the IMSI – If the subscriber has already established comms with the MME it’ll instead be using a temporary identifier – M-TMSI, unless you’ve got a way to see the M-TMSI -> IMSI mapping on the MME you’ll be out of luck.
Next up let’s take a look at the contents of one of these packets,
Inside the protocolIEs is the MME_UE_S1AP_ID – This unique identifier will identify all S1 signalling for a single user.
The MME_UE_S1AP_ID is a unique identifier, assigned by the MME to identify which signaling messages are for which subscriber.
(It’s worth noting the MME_UE_S1AP_ID is only unique to the MME – If you’ve got multiple MMEs the same MME_UE_S1AP_ID could be assigned by each).
So now we have the MME_UE_S1AP_ID, we can filter all S1 messaging containing that MME_UE_S1AP_ID, we’ll use this Wireshark filter to get it:
s1ap.MME_UE_S1AP_ID == 2
Boom, there’s a all the signalling for that subscriber.
Alternatively you can just right click on the value and apply it as a filter instead of typing everything in,
Hopefully that’ll help you filter to find what you’re looking for!
So a problem had arisen, carriers wanted to change certain carrier related settings on devices (Specifically the Carrier Config Manager) in the Android ecosystem. The Android maintainers didn’t want to open the permissions to change these settings to everyone, only the carrier providing service to that device.
And if you purchased a phone from Carrier A, and moved to Carrier B, how do you manage the permissions for Carrier B’s app and then restrict Carrier A’s app?
The carrier loads a certificate onto the SIM Cards, and signing Android Apps with this certificate, allowing the Android OS to verify the certificate on the card and the App are known to each other, and thus the carrier issuing the SIM card also issued the app, and presto, the permissions are granted to the app.
Carriers have full control of the UICC, so this mechanism provides a secure and flexible way to manage apps from the mobile network operator (MNO) hosted on generic app distribution channels (such as Google Play) while retaining special privileges on devices and without the need to sign apps with the per-device platform certificate or preinstall as a system app.
If you’re using an GSM / GPRS, UMTS, LTE or NR network, there’s a good chance all your data to and from the terminal is encapsulated in GTP.
GTP encapsulates user’s data into a GTP PDU / packet that can be redirected easily. This means as users of the network roam around from one part of the network to another, the destination IP of the GTP tunnel just needs to be updated, but the user’s IP address doesn’t change for the duration of their session as the user’s data is in the GTP payload.
One thing that’s a bit confusing is the TEID – Tunnel Endpoint Identifier.
Each tunnel has a sender TEID and transmitter TEID pair, as setup in the Create Session Request / Create Session Response, but in our GTP packet we only see one TEID.
There’s not much to a GTP-U header; at 8 bytes in all it’s pretty lightweight. Flags, message type and length are all pretty self explanatory. There’s an optional sequence number, the TEID value and the payload itself.
So the TEID identifies the tunnel, but it’s worth keeping in mind that the TEID only identifies a data flow from one Network Element to another, for example eNB to S-GW would have one TEID, while S-GW to P-GW would have another TEID.
Each tunnel has two TEIDs, a sending TEID and a receiving TEID. For some reason (Minimize overhead on backhaul maybe?) only the sender TEID is included in the GTP header;
This means a packet that’s coming from a mobile / UE will have one TEID, while a packet that’s going to the same mobile / UE will have a different TEID.
Mapping out TIEDs is typically done by looking at the Create Session Request / Responses, the Create Session Request will have one TIED, while the Create Session Response will have a different TIED, thus giving you your TIED pair.
This is part of a series of posts focusing on common Diameter request pairs, looking at what’s inside and what they do.
The Authentication Information Request (AIR) and Authentication Information Answer (AIA) are one of the first steps in authenticating a subscriber, and a very common Diameter transaction.
The Process
The Authentication Information Request (AIR) is sent by the MME to the HSS to request when a Subscriber begins to attach containing the IMSI of the subscriber trying to connect.
If the subscriber’s IMSI is known to the HSS, the AuC will generate Authentication Vectors for the Subscriber, and repond back to the MME in an Authentication Information Answer (AIA).
The AIR is a comparatively simple request, without many AVPs;
The Session-Id, Auth-Session-State, Origin-Host, Origin-Realm & Destination-Realm are all common AVPs that have to be included.
The Username AVP (AVP 1) contains the username of the subscriber, which in this case is the IMSI.
The Requested-EUTRAN-Authentication-Info AVP ( AVP 1408 ) contains information in regards to what authentication info the MME is requesting from the subscriber, typically this indicates the MME is requesting 1 vector (Number-Of-Requested-Vectors (AVP 1410)), an immediate response is preferred (Immediate-Response-Preferred (AVP 1412)), and if the subscriber is re-resyncing the SQN will include a Re-Synchronization-Info AVP (AVP 1411).
The Visited-PLMN-Id AVP (AVP 1407) contains information regarding the PLMN of the RAN the Subscriber is connecting to.
The Authentication Information Answer (AIA)
The Authentication Information Answer contains several mandatory AVPs that would be expected, The Session-Id, Auth-Session-State, Origin-Host and Origin-Realm.
The Result Code (AVP 268) indicates if the request was successful or not, 2001 indicates DIAMETER SUCCESS.
The Authentication-Info (AVP 1413) contains the returned vectors, in LTE typically only one vector is returned, a sub AVP called E-UTRAN-Vector (AVP 1414), which contains AVPs with the RAND, XRES, AUTN and KASME keys.
In the S1-SETUP-RESPONSE and MME-CONFIGURATION-UPDATE there’s a RelativeMMECapacity (87) IE,
So what does it do?
Most eNBs support connections to multiple MMEs, for redundancy and scalability.
By returning a value from 0 to 255 the MME is able to indicate it’s available capacity to the eNB.
The eNB uses this information to determine which MME to dispatch to, for example:
MME Pool
Relative Capacity
mme001.example.com
20/255
mme002.example.com
230/255
Example MME Pooling table
The eNB with the table above would likely dispatch any incoming traffic to MME002 as MME001 has very little at capacity.
If the capacity was at 1/255 then the MME would very rarely be used.
The exact mechanism for how the MME sets it’s relative capacity is up to the MME implementer, and may vary from MME to MME, but many MMEs support setting a base capacity (for example a less powerful MME you may want to set the relative capacity to make it look more utilised).
I looked to 3GPP to find what the spec says:
On S1, no specific procedure corresponds to the NAS node selection function. The S1 interface supports the indication by the MME of its relative capacity to the eNB, in order to achieve loadbalanced MMEs within the pool area.
3GPP TS 36.410 – 5.9.2 NAS node selection function
I’ve been experimenting with Inter-RAT & Inter-Frequency handovers recetly, and had an issue where what I thought was configured on the eNB I wasn’t seeing reflected on the UEs.
I understood the Neighbouring Cell reelection parameters are broadcast in the System Information Blocks, but how could I view them?
The answer – srsUE!
I can’t get over how cool the stuff coming out of Software Radio Systems is, but being able to simulate a UE and eNB on SDR hardware is pretty awesome, and also allows you to view low layer traces the vast majority of commercial UEs will never expose to a user.
After running srsUE with the PCAP option I let it scan for networks and find mine. I didn’t actually need to authenticate with the network, just lock to the cell.
This is a really useful Feature that allows you to break up your S-GW (And by extension P-GW) selection based on geographical areas.
This can be used to enable Local Breakout to a S/P-GW located at the same site as the tower, but controlled by a central MME / HSS.
After updating to the latest version the configuration is pretty straightforard,
P-GW Selection based on eNB ID
# o SGW selection by eNodeB ID (either single enb_id or multiple enb_ids, decimal or hex representation)
#
selection_mode: enb_id
gtpc:
- addr: 127.0.2.3
enb_id: [9413, 0x98765]
The above config will send any traffic from eNBs with the eNB ID 9413 (encoded as an intiger) or 0x98765 (Encoded as hex int equivilent 624485) to an S-GW at 127.0.2.3.
P-GW Selection based on TAC
# SGW selection by eNodeB TAC (either single TAC or multiple TACs)
#
selection_mode: tac
gtpc:
- addr: 127.0.2.2
tac: [25000, 27000, 28000]
The above config will send any traffic from eNBs with TACs of 25000, 27000, 28000 to an S-GW at 127.0.2.2.
The Origin-State-Id AVP solves a kind of tricky problem – how do you know if a Diameter peer has restarted?
It seems like a simple problem until you think about it. One possible solution would be to add an AVP for “Recently Rebooted”, to be added on the first command queried of it from an endpoint, but what if there are multiple devices connecting to a Diameter endpoint?
The Origin-State AVP is a strikingly simple way to solve this problem. It’s a constantly incrementing counter that resets if the Diameter peer restarts.
If a client receives a Answer/Response where the Origin-State AVP is set to 10, and then the next request it’s set to 11, then the one after that is set to 12, 13, 14, etc, and then a request has the Origin-State AVP set to 5, the client can tell when it’s restarted by the fact 5 is lower than 14, the one before it.
It’s a constantly incrementing counter, that allows Diameter peers to detect if the endpoint has restarted.
Simple but effective.
You can find more about this in RFC3588 – the Diameter Base Protocol.
If you’re using BaiCells hardware you may have noticed the new eNBs and USIMs are shipping with the PLMN of MCC 314 / MNC 030.
First thing I do is change the PLMN, but I was curious as to why the change.
It seems 314 / 030 was never assigned to BaiCells to use and when someone picked this up they were forced to change it.
The MCC (Mobile Country Code) part is dictated by the country / geographic area the subscribers’ are in, as defined by ITU, whereas the MNC (Mobile Network Code) allocation is managed by the regional authority and ITU are informed as to what the allocations are and publish in their bulletins.
Well, SIM cards will have a different IMSI / PLMN, but the hardware supports Multi-Operator Core Network which allows one eNB to broadcast multiple PLMNs, so if you update your eNB it can broadcast both!
There’s a lot of layers of signalling in the LTE / EUTRAN attach procedure, but let’s take a look at the UE attach procedure from the Network Perspective.
We won’t touch on the air interface / Uu side of things, just the EPC side of the signaling.
To make life a bit easier I’ve put different signalling messages in different coloured headings:
After a UE establishes a connection with a cell, the first step involved in the attach process is for the UE / subscriber to identify themselves and the network to authenticate them.
The TAI, EUTRAN-CGI and GUMME-ID sections all contain information about the serving network, such the tracking area code, cell global identifier and global MME ID to make up the GUTI.
The NAS part of this request contains key information about our UE and it’s capabilities, most importantly it includes the IMSI or TMSI of the subscriber, but also includes important information such as SRVCC support, different bands and RAN technologies it supports, codecs, but most importantly, the identity of the subscriber.
If this is a new subscriber to the network, the IMSI is sent as the subscriber identity, however wherever possible sending the IMSI is avoided, so if the subscriber has connected to the network recently, the M-TMSI is used instead of the IMSI, and the MME has a record of which M-TMSI to IMSI mapping it’s allocated.
Diameter: Authentication Information Request
MME to HSS
The MME does not have a subscriber database or information on the Crypto side of things, instead this functionality is offloaded to the HSS.
I’ve gone on and on about LTE UE/Subscriber authentication, so I won’t go into the details as to how this mechanism works, but the MME will send a Authentication-Information Request via Diameter to the HSS with the Username set to the Subscriber’s IMSI.
Diameter: Authentication Information Response
HSS to MME
Assuming the subscriber exists in the HSS, a Authentication-Information Answer will be sent back from the HSS via Diameter to the MME, containing the authentication vectors to send to the UE / subscriber.
Now the MME has the Authentication vectors for that UE / Subscriber it sends back a DownlinkNASTransport, Authentication response, with the NAS section populated with the RAND and AUTN values generated by the HSS in the Authentication-Information Answer.
The Subscriber / UE’s USIM looks at the AUTN value and RAND to authenticate the network, and then calculates it’s response (RES) from the RAND value to provide a RES to send back to the network.
S1AP: UplinkNASTransport, Authentication response
eNB to MME
The subscriber authenticates the network based on the sent values, and if the USIM is happy that the network identity has been verified, it generates a RES (response) value which is sent in the UplinkNASTransport, Authentication response.
The MME compares the RES sent Subscriber / UE’s USIM against the one sent by the MME in the Authentication-Information Answer (the XRES – Expected RES).
If the two match then the subscriber is authenticated.
The DownlinkNASTransport, Security mode command is then sent by the MME to the UE to activate the ciphering and integrity protection required by the network, as set in the NAS Security Algorithms section;
The MME and the UE/Subscriber are able to derive the Ciphering Key (CK) and Integrity Key (IK) from the sent crypto variables earlier, and now both know them.
S1AP: UplinkNASTransport, Security mode complete
eNB to MME
After the UE / Subscriber has derived the Ciphering Key (CK) and Integrity Key (IK) from the sent crypto variables earlier, it can put them into place as required by the NAS Security algorithms sent in the Security mode command request.
It indicates this is completed by sending the UplinkNASTransport, Security mode complete.
At this stage the authentication of the subscriber is done, and a default bearer must be established.
Diameter: Update Location Request
MME to HSS
Once the Security mode has been completed the MME signals to the HSS the Subscriber’s presence on the network and requests their Subscription-Data from the HSS.
Diameter: Update Location Answer
HSS to MME
The ULA response contains the Subscription Data used to define the data service provided to the subscriber, including the AMBR (Aggregate Maximum Bit Rate), list of valid APNs and TAU Timer.
GTP-C: Create Session Request
MME to S-GW
The MME transfers the responsibility of setting up the data bearers to the S-GW in the form of the Create Session Request.
This includes the Tunnel Endpoint Identifier (TEID) to be assigned for this UE’s PDN.
The S-GW looks at the request and forwards it onto a P-GW for IP address assignment and access to the outside world.
GTP-C: Create Session Request
S-GW to P-GW
The S-GW sends a Create Session Request to the P-GW to setup a path to the outside world.
Diameter: Credit Control Request
P-GW to PCRF
To ensure the subscriber is in a state to establish a new PDN connection (not out of credit etc), a Credit Control Request is sent to the HSS.
Diameter: Credit Control Answer
PCRF to P-GW
Assuming the Subscriber has adequate credit for this, a Credit Control Answer is sent and the P-GW and continue the PDN setup for the subscriber.
GTP-C: Create Session Response
P-GW to S-GW
The P-GW sends back a Create Session Response, containing the IP address allocated to this PDN (Framed-IP-Address).
GTP-C: Create Session Response
S-GW to MME
The S-GW slightly changes and then relays the Create Session Response back to the MME,
This message is sent to inform the eNB of the details of the PDN connection to be setup, ie AMBR, tracking area list, APN and Protocol Configuration Options,
This contains the Tunnel Endpoint Identifier (TEID) for this PDN to identify the GTP packets.
These posts focus on the use of Diameter and SIP in an IMS / VoLTE context, however these practices can be equally applied to other networks.
The Registration-Termination Request / Answer allow a Diameter Client (S-CSCF) to indicate to the HSS (Diameter Server) that it is no longer serving that user and the registration has been terminated.
Basics:
The RFC’s definition is actually pretty succinct as to the function of the Server-Assignment Request/Answer:
The Registration-Termination-Request is sent by a Diameter Multimedia server to a Diameter Multimedia client in order to request the de-registration of a user.
Reference: TS 29.229
The Registration-Termination-Request commands are sent by a S-CSCF to indicate to the Diameter server that it is no longer serving a specific subscriber, and therefore this subscriber is now unregistered.
There are a variety of reasons for this, such as PERMANENT_TERMINATION, NEW_SIP_SERVER_ASSIGNED and SIP_SERVER_CHANGE.
The Diameter Server (HSS) will typically send the Diameter Client (S-CSCF) a Registration-Termination-Answer in response to indicate it has updated it’s internal database and will no longer consider the user to be registered at that S-CSCF.
Packet Capture
I’ve included a packet capture of these Diameter Commands from my lab network which you can find below.
